2016
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel troponin I rule-out value below the upper reference limit for acute myocardial infarction

Abstract: Cut-off values for hs-cTnI measurements are determined which allow a similar diagnostic classification as compared with hs-cTnT. Importantly, for a rule-out paradigm this cut-off value is unmistakably lower than the upper reference limit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining 87 articles were assessed in full-text, after which 66 studies were excluded for various reasons (Figure 1). Of the 21 articles discussed in the present systematic review (Table 1), 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 11,929 patients and an overall prevalence of AMI of 13.0% (range 3.6-56%) 17,19,20,[24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32][33]35,36…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The remaining 87 articles were assessed in full-text, after which 66 studies were excluded for various reasons (Figure 1). Of the 21 articles discussed in the present systematic review (Table 1), 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 11,929 patients and an overall prevalence of AMI of 13.0% (range 3.6-56%) 17,19,20,[24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32][33]35,36…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,[20][21][22][23][24]34,35 Eleven studies used the hs-cTnT assay as part of their reference standard and were considered as high risk for incorporation bias. [20][21][22][23]25,26,28,31,32,35,36 Seven studies did not exclude STEMI patients, 16,17,25,27,29,30,33 thus raising concerns about applicability. All studies formally re-adjudicated the final diagnoses, except the study by Slagman et al 35 in which the initial clinical diagnosis was used to establish the endpoints.…”
Section: Methodological Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They report that a cardiac troponin I concentration <10 ng/L or a change of <20 ng/L on serial testing had a negative predictive value for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction of 99.8% and 98.7%, respectively 1. While we agree that there are better approaches to rule out myocardial infarction than using the 99th centile upper reference limit,2 3 we have several concerns about the generalisability and application of these thresholds in clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%