2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel tool for the removal of muscle artefacts from EEG: Improving data quality in the gamma frequency range

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ICA data were then retransformed to EEG. A second ICA was performed and muscle artefacts were removed from the data ( Liebisch et al, 2021 ). The number of components was automatically adjusted by the software according to the removed components in the previous step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ICA data were then retransformed to EEG. A second ICA was performed and muscle artefacts were removed from the data ( Liebisch et al, 2021 ). The number of components was automatically adjusted by the software according to the removed components in the previous step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the data were downsampled to 256 Hz and re-referenced to the common average reference. Please note our previous publication for more details on the rationale for these steps ( Liebisch et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the component data, 50 Hz power line noise was removed using CleanLine (Mullen, 2012) and artefactual components reflecting eye movements and other larger artefacts were removed from the data. A second ICA was performed and muscle artefacts were removed from the data (Liebisch et al, 2021). A third ICA was utilised to remove components with residual artefacts and spectrum interpolation (Leske & Dalal, 2019) eliminated residual power line noise.…”
Section: Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, studies that do not sufficiently clear the data of artifacts will inevitably misinterpret high-frequency artifacts as cortical signals ( 24 ) or vice versa ( 20 , 27 ). This issue can be mitigated with the application of algorithms for the identification and removal of high-frequency EEG features of extracortical origin ( 26 , 28 , 29 ). As many of these approaches are using source separation methods ( 25 , 26 , 28 ), the use of a multielectrode array is imperative to provide sufficient independent input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue can be mitigated with the application of algorithms for the identification and removal of high-frequency EEG features of extracortical origin ( 26 , 28 , 29 ). As many of these approaches are using source separation methods ( 25 , 26 , 28 ), the use of a multielectrode array is imperative to provide sufficient independent input. In addition, high-density coverage of the scalp helps to assess the plausibility of the neuronal effect by evaluating gamma topographies ( 22 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%