A novel technique for NGT fixation: Secure, simple, and safe

Abdulrahman, Rand; Awadhi, Mohammed; Hasan, Hesham M; Shankar, Raghu; Ahmed, Hussain; Farhan, Abeer; Corbally, Martin

doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.06.009

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Magill forceps have become routinely used for the removal of foreign bodies from airways, even for objects as small as a safety pin [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. These forceps have also been used in the placement of nasogastric tubes into the esophagus under direct visualization [33,34]. While Tylke forceps could theoretically be used for the retrieval of foreign objects, the semi-closed loop design of the distal aspect of the tongs could possibly complicate this process.…”

Section: Figure 4: Illustration Of Magill Forceps (A) and Tylke Force...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental Analysis of the Efficiency and Usability of Tylke Versus Magill Forceps

Talbot,

Luther,

Spillers

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The procedure of nasotracheal intubation (NI) has long been performed utilizing the Magill forceps as developed by Sir Ivan Magill in the 1920s. While used for nearly a century, several serious patient safety concerns remain including torn tube cuffs, vocal cord trauma, and inefficient tube placement. The Tylke forceps have been developed as a modification to the largely unchanged form of Magill forceps.Methods: In the present investigation we compared the efficacy, number of clasps, and muscle activation involved in NI using the Tylke forceps versus the Magill forceps in previously untrained individuals.Results: Tylke forceps showed faster successful NI over the standard Magill forceps at an average intubation time of 6.54s vs. 13.73s, respectively. Tylke forceps also had fewer clasps per intubation over the Magill. The trapezius, deltoid, and brachioradialis muscle activation was also compared in Tylke vs Magill forceps intubation trials. Tylke forceps required less lower muscle activation in the brachioradialis and trapezius over the Magill forceps with Tylke forceps resulting in higher deltoid muscle activation.Conclusion: Tylke forceps were more efficacious and reduced the number of clasps over the Magill forceps when used in successful NI with different muscle activation patterns.

show abstract