2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-022-10319-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel structural model for strainburst hazard considering the surrounding rock-burst volume interaction and its use to obtain a strength criterion for strainbursts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This rockburst testing system, developed by professor Su et al (Su, Jiang, et al, 2017; Su, Zhai, et al, 2017) at Guangxi University, China, is composed of the main testing machine, a dynamic disturbance system, a data acquisition system, a high‐speed camera monitoring system, and an acoustic emission (AE) monitoring system (Figure 1). The strainburst experiments performed in this study are actually structural model tests because a strainburst is usually regarded as a structural failure (instability) of a large volume of rock mass in a high‐stress state near the excavation boundary in the strainburst experiments conducted before (Hu, Li, et al, 2020; Liang et al, 2022; Su, Hu, et al, 2017; Su, Jiang, et al, 2017; Su, Zhai, et al, 2017). The surrounding rock‐burst volume interaction was considered, hard rock samples with relatively large sizes (100 mm × 100 mm × 200 mm) were used to represent the burst volume, and the testing machine was used to represent the surrounding rock.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This rockburst testing system, developed by professor Su et al (Su, Jiang, et al, 2017; Su, Zhai, et al, 2017) at Guangxi University, China, is composed of the main testing machine, a dynamic disturbance system, a data acquisition system, a high‐speed camera monitoring system, and an acoustic emission (AE) monitoring system (Figure 1). The strainburst experiments performed in this study are actually structural model tests because a strainburst is usually regarded as a structural failure (instability) of a large volume of rock mass in a high‐stress state near the excavation boundary in the strainburst experiments conducted before (Hu, Li, et al, 2020; Liang et al, 2022; Su, Hu, et al, 2017; Su, Jiang, et al, 2017; Su, Zhai, et al, 2017). The surrounding rock‐burst volume interaction was considered, hard rock samples with relatively large sizes (100 mm × 100 mm × 200 mm) were used to represent the burst volume, and the testing machine was used to represent the surrounding rock.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rockbursts are extremely dangerous in that they seriously hamper the safety of deep rock engineering. In recent decades, great efforts have been made by researchers to study rockbursts (Cai & Kaiser, 2018; Cook, 1965; Feng et al, 2018; He et al, 2010, 2012; Hu, 2017; Hu, Li, et al, 2020; Hu et al, 2021; Hu, Su, et al, 2020; Liang et al, 2022; Ortlepp & Stacey, 1994; Su, Feng, et al, 2017; Su, Hu, et al, 2017; Su, Jiang, et al, 2017; Su, Zhai, et al, 2017). In general, rockburst can be classified into strainbursts, pillar‐bursts, and fault‐slip bursts, among which strainburst is the most commonly seen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%