2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.10.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel stop-flow two-dimensional liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method for lipid analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that, typically, current ESI-MS systems offer only 3–4 orders of magnitude linear dynamic range, it is obvious that, for quantitative methods covering a broad range of lipid classes/ species and concentrations in biological samples, a compromise has to be made with respect to number of detected lipids and the linear dynamic range of the method, unavoidably leading to a lower number of detected and identified lipids compared to qualitative methods where, usually, more concentrated extracts are injected. Specifically, those few studies where the number of annotated/ identified lipids exceeded 350 species were focused mainly on in-depth characterization of lipid extracts [32,38,49,5760], while only 50–300 annotated lipid species were reported when quantification was mentioned as major aim in studies. A deeper examination of particular lipid classes showed that LC-MS-based lipidomics methods most frequently covered phosphatidylcho-lines, followed by other phospholipids (phosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylinositols, phosphatidylserines, phosphatidylglycerols), sphingomyelins, di- and tri-acylglycerols, and ceramides (Fig.…”
Section: Lipid Identification and Automated Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that, typically, current ESI-MS systems offer only 3–4 orders of magnitude linear dynamic range, it is obvious that, for quantitative methods covering a broad range of lipid classes/ species and concentrations in biological samples, a compromise has to be made with respect to number of detected lipids and the linear dynamic range of the method, unavoidably leading to a lower number of detected and identified lipids compared to qualitative methods where, usually, more concentrated extracts are injected. Specifically, those few studies where the number of annotated/ identified lipids exceeded 350 species were focused mainly on in-depth characterization of lipid extracts [32,38,49,5760], while only 50–300 annotated lipid species were reported when quantification was mentioned as major aim in studies. A deeper examination of particular lipid classes showed that LC-MS-based lipidomics methods most frequently covered phosphatidylcho-lines, followed by other phospholipids (phosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylinositols, phosphatidylserines, phosphatidylglycerols), sphingomyelins, di- and tri-acylglycerols, and ceramides (Fig.…”
Section: Lipid Identification and Automated Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak capacity of this stop-flow 2D LC method was calculated using a previous reported method [19]. Generally speaking, the total peak capacity (n c,t ) equals the sum of the peak capacity of each fraction in the second dimension.…”
Section: Peak Capacity and Orthogonality Of The Stop-flow 2d Lc Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedure for on-line stop-flow 2D LC analysis An on-line stop-flow 2D LC approach (as described in our previous work [19]) was employed to analyze triterpenoid saponins. The specific scheme is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Instrumentation and Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the stop-flow mode seems to be convenient to increase 2 TG [39][40][41], it is time consuming [40] even with UHPLC conditions in the 2 D [41,42], and, in addition, it requires additional hardware. Moreover, axial dispersion may be a critical issue, particularly for the most retained compounds, thereby leading to significant peak band broadening [8].…”
Section: The Quest For Large Separation Power In On-line Lc X Lc Applmentioning
confidence: 99%