2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel splice site mutation of the LDL receptor gene in a Tunisian hypercholesterolemic family

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many different human diseases can be caused by errors in mRNA splicing or its regulation. Interestingly, intronic deletions causing exon skipping or intron retention in the human LDLR gene were identified in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (4,9,12,22,40). Because the human LDLR gene is homologous to the chicken tva gene, it is tempting to speculate that this is a common mechanism of mutagenesis within this gene family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different human diseases can be caused by errors in mRNA splicing or its regulation. Interestingly, intronic deletions causing exon skipping or intron retention in the human LDLR gene were identified in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (4,9,12,22,40). Because the human LDLR gene is homologous to the chicken tva gene, it is tempting to speculate that this is a common mechanism of mutagenesis within this gene family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of mutations identified in the LDLR gene are point mutations (5). However, this figure could be an underestimate as screening programmes have tended to focus on screening for point mutations by methods such as single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis (7), denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) electrophoresis (8), and more recently by direct sequence analysis (9). However, this figure could be an underestimate as screening programmes have tended to focus on screening for point mutations by methods such as single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis (7), denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) electrophoresis (8), and more recently by direct sequence analysis (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of intronic variants being reported is increasing as the regions of the gene being screened now include more of the intronic sequences [14]. Any sequence changes that disrupt the canonical exon-intron consensus splice sequences (as was recently reported for a sequence change 1 bp into intron 8 found in a patient from Tunisia [15]) can be safely predicted to affect normal splicing; 67% of the 87 intronic variants reported fall into this category. A clinical diagnostic laboratory would normally accept such changes as being pathogenic but would require further evidence for changes more than 5 bp from the consensus sites [7 ].…”
Section: Determining the Functionality Of Intronic Variantsmentioning
confidence: 93%