2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2018.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel spatial pooling method for 3D mesh quality assessment based on percentile weighting strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher values of M imply a higher weighting towards large distortions. In many studies, M is chosen arbitrarily, but tends to have a value between 2 and 3, [48]. Note that setting M = 1 reduces Minkowski pooling to the arithmetic mean,…”
Section: Visual Impact Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Higher values of M imply a higher weighting towards large distortions. In many studies, M is chosen arbitrarily, but tends to have a value between 2 and 3, [48]. Note that setting M = 1 reduces Minkowski pooling to the arithmetic mean,…”
Section: Visual Impact Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minkowski pooling is used to approximate visual impact in many full-reference VQA models. While Minkowski pooling somewhat accounts for human perceptual behaviour, this method has its drawbacks: Firstly, Minkowski pooling treats all distortions as independent, when in reality, the effects of multiple distortions over-lap to influence visual quality perceptions, [48]. Second, Minkowski pooling assumes the visual impact of a distortion is directly related to the extent of geometric displacement with no other compounding factors.…”
Section: Visual Impact Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations