2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel smartphone application is reliable for repeat administration and comparable to the Tekscan Strideway for spatiotemporal gait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Test–retest reliability of the Health app was consistently good to excellent for all gait parameters in adults (ICC = 0.75–0.80) and seniors (ICC = 0.88–0.93). These findings correspond to those reported for the OneStep and Gait Analyzer apps, which also demonstrated good to excellent test–retest reliability for measuring gait speed (ICC = 0.77–0.98), step length (ICC = 0.80–0.97), and/or double support time (ICC = 0.90–0.98) in adults 31 , 33 , 37 . In contrast, reliability of the Health app was poor to moderate for measuring gait speed and step length in children (ICC = 0.39–0.61), which was lower than that of the Gait Analyzer app in children and adolescents (ICC = 0.87–0.94) 30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Test–retest reliability of the Health app was consistently good to excellent for all gait parameters in adults (ICC = 0.75–0.80) and seniors (ICC = 0.88–0.93). These findings correspond to those reported for the OneStep and Gait Analyzer apps, which also demonstrated good to excellent test–retest reliability for measuring gait speed (ICC = 0.77–0.98), step length (ICC = 0.80–0.97), and/or double support time (ICC = 0.90–0.98) in adults 31 , 33 , 37 . In contrast, reliability of the Health app was poor to moderate for measuring gait speed and step length in children (ICC = 0.39–0.61), which was lower than that of the Gait Analyzer app in children and adolescents (ICC = 0.87–0.94) 30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Given the ubiquity, easy accessibility and high acceptability of smartphones, applications (apps) that use these built-in IMUs for gait monitoring combined with easy-to-use interfaces, automatic data processing and analysis, and real-time reporting on gait performance may overcome the limitations of stand-alone IMUs. There is emerging evidence for the validity and/or reliability of smartphone apps to quantify spatio-temporal gait parameters in children and adolescents 30 , young and/or older adults 31 – 38 , and patients with (neuro-)muscular pathologies 39 42 . Apart from a few exceptions (e.g., Apple Health, OneStep, Gait Analyzer), most of these apps still focus on standardized measurements of gait capacity by providing multimedia instructions for self-administered test protocols 34 36 , 39 , 40 and depend a standardized smartphone placement (e.g., sacroiliac belt) 35 , 36 , 39 , 42 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online calculations of step time, step length, gait velocity, and cadence were computed as previously described using each step [22]. This application has high intrarater and interrater reliability [22], sufficient validity when compared to motion capture [22], and high validity and good to high testretest reliability [26]. Specifically, tri-axial accelerations, which were collected at the smartphone's maximum sampling frequency (Android: SENSOR_DELAY_FASTEST; 95-105 Hz range), were resampled to 100 Hz, to ensure a constant sampling rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern smartphones are used by approximately 45% of the world's population [21] and are fairly accurate, depending on the internal accelerometers, in tracking gait features [22,23]. The Gait Analyzer [24] created by Control One LLC, has gained popularity as published research indicates it can accurately track gait of pathological and older adult populations [24][25][26]. This application was recently validated against a gold standard gait mat [26], acceptable levels of intrarater and interrater reliability [22], and sufficient validity when compared to motion capture [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation