2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3094864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Simplified Implementation of Finite-Set Model Predictive Control for Power Converters

Abstract: This paper presents a novel simplified method to implement the finite set -model predictive control technique for photovoltaic generation systems connected to the ac network. This method maintains the advantages of the conventional finite set -model predictive control, such as fast response, simple implementation, and easy understanding; but it also eliminates the use of a cost function and hence the weighting factors, instead, it finds the optimal operating state directly from the model and the discrete numbe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [13] a new concept No-Iteration-MPC (NI-MPC) is proposed to simplify the implementation of a FS-MPC for an AFE converter (8 states), which does not require a cost function, present a 43% reduction in the computational cost, and has the same behavior in the output electrical variables with respect to the FS-MPC conventional method. However, this work does not present the formulation of this concept for other more complex converter topologies, especially those with a significant number of states, where the computational effort when using a cost function is much higher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13] a new concept No-Iteration-MPC (NI-MPC) is proposed to simplify the implementation of a FS-MPC for an AFE converter (8 states), which does not require a cost function, present a 43% reduction in the computational cost, and has the same behavior in the output electrical variables with respect to the FS-MPC conventional method. However, this work does not present the formulation of this concept for other more complex converter topologies, especially those with a significant number of states, where the computational effort when using a cost function is much higher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accomplish N samples per second, a variable sample controller should be introduced [ 10 ] in the digital board. Due to the variable sample time algorithm’s quick dynamic response, it is possible to neglect this dynamic in the rectifier current and voltage controller design [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve these problems, a simplification method of FCS-MPC has been proposed and discussed in [25][26][27]. In [25], sector distribution on a source voltage vector to reduce the Though this method reduces the program running time, the input and output performance may be affected since the selected switching vector based on this method is not the necessarily the optimal switching vector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed simplified method is not completely equivalent to the original method. The method in [26] identified the optimal operating state directly from the model and the discrete number of valid states of the converter. The main advantage of this technique is that it reduces the computational cost by 43% of the algorithm that selects the best state, presenting a simple and complete algorithm without compromising the predictive control performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation