2003
DOI: 10.1023/b:jcam.0000005766.95985.7e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel scoring function for molecular docking

Abstract: We present a novel scoring function for docking of small molecules to protein binding sites. The scoring function is based on a combination of two main approaches used in the field, the empirical and knowledge-based approaches. To calibrate the scoring function we used an iterative procedure in which a ligand's position and its score were determined self-consistently at each iteration. The scoring function demonstrated superiority in prediction of ligand positions in docking tests against the commonly used Doc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical scoring functions [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] consist of a set of terms characterizing various aspects of protein-ligand interactions such as energies of hydrogen bonding, steric interactions, lipophilic interactions, solvation, and entropic effects, and are therefore somewhat related to force-field based scoring functions. These descriptor terms are then usually combined into an overall scoring function by applying linear regression to the descriptor coefficients to fit binding affinity data of a set of protein-ligand complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical scoring functions [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] consist of a set of terms characterizing various aspects of protein-ligand interactions such as energies of hydrogen bonding, steric interactions, lipophilic interactions, solvation, and entropic effects, and are therefore somewhat related to force-field based scoring functions. These descriptor terms are then usually combined into an overall scoring function by applying linear regression to the descriptor coefficients to fit binding affinity data of a set of protein-ligand complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also applied an in-house docking program with a scoring function combining both empirical and knowledge-based approaches [22,23] to obtain calculated binding energies (docking scores) for our datasets. Protein Data Bank (PDB) [24] entries 1eb2, 1ets, 1fjs, and 1gjc were used for trypsin, thrombin, fXa, and uPA docking, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other knowledge-based potentials were introduced [70, 81,102,133,200,213,221,306], mostly differing in the specific functional form of the atom pair potential or the size of the training dataset. Gohlke introduced the DrugScore [102] function with an additional nonpolar surface dependent single atom term to reflect the hydrophobic collapse.…”
Section: Knowledge-based Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%