Abstract:Regulation of microRNA (miR) biogenesis is complex and stringently controlled. Here, we identify the kinase GSK3β as an important modulator of miR biogenesis at Microprocessor level. Repression of GSK3β activity reduces Drosha activity toward pri-miRs, leading to accumulation of unprocessed pri-miRs and reduction of pre-miRs and mature miRs without altering levels or cellular localisation of miR biogenesis proteins. Conversely, GSK3β activation increases Drosha activity and mature miR accumulation. GSK3β achie… Show more
“…The Microprocessor Drosha/DGCR8 is responsible for releasing individual pre-miRNAs from pri-miRNA transcripts; upon export to the cytoplasm, pre-miRNAs are further processed into mature miRNAs by Dicer/TRBP, which are finally incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) for functional execution on target mRNAs ( 24 ). Importantly, each of these processing steps has been shown to subject to modulation by various RBPs ( 24 ) as well as by post-translational modification of the core machineries ( 51 , 52 ). Relevant to our current study, multiple RBPs have been implicated in the regulation of the Microprocessor-mediated conversion from pri-miRNA to pre-miRNA, including positive regulators, such as DDX5/17 (aka p68/p72) ( 53 – 56 ), hnRNP A1 ( 57 , 58 ), and KSRP ( 59 ), and negative regulators, such as Lin28 ( 60 ) and ADAR1/2 ( 61 , 62 ).…”
The Ewing Sarcoma protein (EWS) is a multifaceted RNA binding protein (RBP) with established roles in transcription, pre-mRNA processing and DNA damage response. By generating high quality EWS–RNA interactome, we uncovered its specific and prevalent interaction with a large subset of primary microRNAs (pri-miRNAs) in mammalian cells. Knockdown of EWS reduced, whereas overexpression enhanced, the expression of its target miRNAs. Biochemical analysis revealed that multiple elements in target pri-miRNAs, including the sequences flanking the stem–loop region, contributed to high affinity EWS binding and sequence swap experiments between target and non-target demonstrated that the flanking sequences provided the specificity for enhanced pri-miRNA processing by the Microprocessor Drosha/DGCR8. Interestingly, while repressing Drosha expression, as reported earlier, we found that EWS was able to enhance the recruitment of Drosha to chromatin. Together, these findings suggest that EWS may positively and negatively regulate miRNA biogenesis via distinct mechanisms, thus providing a new foundation to understand the function of EWS in development and disease.
“…The Microprocessor Drosha/DGCR8 is responsible for releasing individual pre-miRNAs from pri-miRNA transcripts; upon export to the cytoplasm, pre-miRNAs are further processed into mature miRNAs by Dicer/TRBP, which are finally incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) for functional execution on target mRNAs ( 24 ). Importantly, each of these processing steps has been shown to subject to modulation by various RBPs ( 24 ) as well as by post-translational modification of the core machineries ( 51 , 52 ). Relevant to our current study, multiple RBPs have been implicated in the regulation of the Microprocessor-mediated conversion from pri-miRNA to pre-miRNA, including positive regulators, such as DDX5/17 (aka p68/p72) ( 53 – 56 ), hnRNP A1 ( 57 , 58 ), and KSRP ( 59 ), and negative regulators, such as Lin28 ( 60 ) and ADAR1/2 ( 61 , 62 ).…”
The Ewing Sarcoma protein (EWS) is a multifaceted RNA binding protein (RBP) with established roles in transcription, pre-mRNA processing and DNA damage response. By generating high quality EWS–RNA interactome, we uncovered its specific and prevalent interaction with a large subset of primary microRNAs (pri-miRNAs) in mammalian cells. Knockdown of EWS reduced, whereas overexpression enhanced, the expression of its target miRNAs. Biochemical analysis revealed that multiple elements in target pri-miRNAs, including the sequences flanking the stem–loop region, contributed to high affinity EWS binding and sequence swap experiments between target and non-target demonstrated that the flanking sequences provided the specificity for enhanced pri-miRNA processing by the Microprocessor Drosha/DGCR8. Interestingly, while repressing Drosha expression, as reported earlier, we found that EWS was able to enhance the recruitment of Drosha to chromatin. Together, these findings suggest that EWS may positively and negatively regulate miRNA biogenesis via distinct mechanisms, thus providing a new foundation to understand the function of EWS in development and disease.
“…Facilitates pri-miRNA binding by DROSHA and enhances DROSHA association with cofactors DGCR8 and P72 [136]; DROSHA phosphorylation/stabilization [137]…”
It is a well-known and intensively studied phenomenon that the levels of many miRNAs are differentiated in cancer. miRNA biogenesis and functional expression are complex processes orchestrated by many proteins cumulatively called miRNA biogenesis proteins. To characterize cancer somatic mutations in the miRNA biogenesis genes and investigate their potential impact on the levels of miRNAs, we analyzed whole-exome sequencing datasets of over 10,000 cancer/normal sample pairs deposited within the TCGA repository. We identified and characterized over 3,600 somatic mutations in 29 miRNA biogenesis genes and showed that some of the genes are overmutated in specific cancers and/or have recurrent hotspot mutations (e.g., SMAD4 in PAAD, COAD, and READ; DICER1 in UCEC; PRKRA in OV; and LIN28B in SKCM). We identified a list of miRNAs whose level is affected by particular types of mutations in either SMAD4, SMAD2, or DICER1 and showed that hotspot mutations in the RNase domains in DICER1 not only decrease the level of 5p-miRNAs but also increase the level of 3p-miRNAs, including many well-known cancer-related miRNAs. We also showed an association of the mutations with patient survival. Eventually, we created an atlas/compendium of miRNA biogenesis alterations providing a useful resource for different aspects of biomedical research.
“…Within the two main modes of action on either the Microprocessor or the pri‐miRNA, several distinct mechanisms can be distinguished to more precisely explain how an accessory protein can impact on miRNA processing. Namely, for proteins directly binding the Microprocessor, we can distinguish between Microprocessor post‐translational modification and direct binding competition between Drosha and DGCR8 . Proteins interacting with the pri‐miRNA can either act by regulating its binding by the Microprocessor either negatively or positively , by remodeling the transcript structure , or by inducing pri‐miRNA post‐transcriptional modifications .…”
Section: Regulation Of Pri‐mirna Processing By Accessory Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Drosha is phosphorylated by the protein kinase Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), implicated also in a large number of signaling pathways involving proteins such as Hedgehog, Notch, and WNT/β‐catenin. Interestingly, GSK3β is only able to act in an RNA‐dependent manner, since it cannot directly bind Drosha or DGCR8 . Moreover, at least 23 phosphorylated amino acids have been described on DGCR8.…”
Section: Regulation Of Pri‐mirna Processing By Accessory Proteinsmentioning
Edited by Wilhelm JustMicroRNAs (miRNAs) are evolutionarily conserved small regulatory RNAs that participate in the adjustment of many, if not all, fundamental biological processes. Molecular mechanisms involved in miRNA biogenesis and mode of action have been elucidated in the past two decades. Similar to many cellular pathways, miRNA processing and function can be globally or specifically regulated at several levels and by numerous proteins and RNAs. Given their role as fine-tuning molecules, it is essential for miRNA expression to be tightly regulated in order to maintain cellular homeostasis. Here, we review our current knowledge of the first step of their maturation occurring in the nucleus and how it can be specifically and dynamically modulated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.