A novel robot arm selection methodology based on axiomatic design principles

Bahadir, Mehmet Cagatay; Satoğlu, Şule Itır

doi:10.1007/s00170-014-5620-2

Cited by 26 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Chatterjee et al applied VIKOR and elimination and et choice translating reality (ELECTRE) methods for dealing with a robot selection problem and compared their relative performance in the given application. Bahadir and Satoglu used axiomatic design and TOPSIS methods to help a food manufacturing system select a suitable real robot arm.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For instance, Table 9 represents the results of the concordance/discordance indexes for G 1 . The weighted concordance/discordance indexes ϕ A A ( , ) in the χ thpermutation are computed using Equation (27) and the results are shown in Table 10. Finally, the comprehensive concordance/discordance indexes ϕ χ ( = 1, 2, ... ,6) χ are calculated based on Equation (28) It can be shown that G ϕ ϕ = max ( ) = χ χ ⁎ =1,2,...,6 6 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An integrated MCDM method for robot selection under interval‐valued Pythagorean uncertain linguistic environment

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Robots have received considerable attention in many manufacturing companies due to their great capabilities and characteristics. Selecting an appropriate robot for a specific application can be regarded as a challenging multicriteria decision‐making problem. Furthermore, decision makers are inclined to represent their opinions by using linguistic terms owing to their ambiguous thinking. In this regard, we put forward a novel robot selection model by integrating quality function development (QFD) theory and qualitative flexible multiple criteria method (QUALIFLEX) under interval‐valued Pythagorean uncertain linguistic context. For the developed model, the evaluations given by decision makers are presented as interval‐valued Pythagorean uncertain linguistic sets for dealing with the uncertainty and vagueness of decision makers’ information. An extended QFD method is used for determining criteria weights from the perspective of customers. A modified QUALIFLEX technique based on closeness degree is utilized to generate the ranking order of alternative robots and determine the most suitable one. Finally, an empirical example of an auto manufacturing company is applied to clarify the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed robot selection approach.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

An integrated MCDM method for robot selection under interval‐valued Pythagorean uncertain linguistic environment

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As demonstrated by many authors working in wide ranges of environments and applications [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Axiomatic Design (AD) provides a highly-structured decision-making process for the design phase of a product/process, especially when many and different needs shall be considered simultaneously [17][18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Axiomatic Design of Test Artifact for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Machine Capability Assessment

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Additive Manufacturing is increasingly growing in importance in the manufacturing environment, allowing to realize very complex product designs. Identifying the real machine capability is becoming fundamental as additive manufacturing technologies are starting to substitute conventional manufacturing processes. This aspect holds particularly true in the case of Laser Powder Bed Fusion technology. In this case, the method to investigate and determine the actual machine capabilities still represents an open point. In this paper, we propose an analysis of a well-known test artifact from an Axiomatic Design standpoint; based on the results and the review of the Customer Needs, we develop an improved design which is able to ensure a robust analysis for a reliable machine performance check.

show abstract

“…In order to avoid the pitfalls of preceding methods, the AD method enables decision makers to evaluate both qualitative and quantitative criteria together. The traditional AD methodology has been applied by many researchers in various applications such as Kulak et al [29], Gonçalves-Coelho and Mourão [14], Bahadir and A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 3 Satoglu [2]. Kulak et al [27] reviewed and classified the applications of AD principles in the literature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A new multi criteria decision making approach for medical imaging systems considering risk factors

Kulak

Gören

Supçiller

2015

Applied Soft Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A novel robot arm selection methodology based on axiomatic design principles

Cited by 26 publications

References 40 publications

An integrated MCDM method for robot selection under interval‐valued Pythagorean uncertain linguistic environment

An integrated MCDM method for robot selection under interval‐valued Pythagorean uncertain linguistic environment

Axiomatic Design of Test Artifact for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Machine Capability Assessment

A new multi criteria decision making approach for medical imaging systems considering risk factors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About