2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-018-6079-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Redundant Hole Identification and Healing Algorithm for a Homogeneous Distributed Wireless Sensor Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The network is simulated for 100 × 100 area for 80 sensor nodes with 10 m sensing range [5]. From table 3 and 4, we are able to prove, the proposed solution can heal the hole area more efficiently upto 98% in left uncovered area from [23]. Whereas, with 22%lesser redundant nodes, our approach covered the 3.6% higher relative covered area.…”
Section: Results Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The network is simulated for 100 × 100 area for 80 sensor nodes with 10 m sensing range [5]. From table 3 and 4, we are able to prove, the proposed solution can heal the hole area more efficiently upto 98% in left uncovered area from [23]. Whereas, with 22%lesser redundant nodes, our approach covered the 3.6% higher relative covered area.…”
Section: Results Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is the measure drawback of CPSO [24] for the coverage hole healing. We compared our approach with [23] which considered the redundant nodes which are already in active state in the network. Since, these are taking part in the communication, there energy might deplete to some extent already.…”
Section: Results Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this solution is devoted to only closed holes and does not prevent the formation of new holes. Joshita et al [49] proposed to vary nodes' sensing ranges along with a random mobility. This scheme helps to minimize the number of candidates and the number of overlapped areas, but also cannot prevent new holes to appear.…”
Section: Hole Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 99%