2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/wcncw.2016.7552693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel RACH mechanism for dense cellular-IoT deployments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further enhance the RACH success rate many mechanisms have been proposed in the literature. A fast RACH mechanism has been proposed in [8] that allows a fixed number of devices to contend in a time slot that results in more number of RACH successes. In [9], a distributed queue based approach has been proposed that allows the M2M devices to self organize themselves into a logical queue and start RACH mechanism based on the device's position in the logical queue in order to improve the success rate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To further enhance the RACH success rate many mechanisms have been proposed in the literature. A fast RACH mechanism has been proposed in [8] that allows a fixed number of devices to contend in a time slot that results in more number of RACH successes. In [9], a distributed queue based approach has been proposed that allows the M2M devices to self organize themselves into a logical queue and start RACH mechanism based on the device's position in the logical queue in order to improve the success rate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the number of devices that are successful with both intra-slot and inter-slot SIC also increases with the slot number. Thus, the total number of RACH successes for the proposed mechanism increases Mechanism Parameter Value 3GPP-EAB [7] Average throughput 37% FRM [8] Average throughput 37% QDAM [12] Average throughput 91.67% Access delay M-ACB [13] Success rate 86% Time delays 1250 TDIA [14] Probability of successful 98% preamble transmission CBGP [15] Successful access probability 0.75 Average access delay 7000 SACB [23] Average access delay 500 EH-based ACB [26] Throughput 75% Preamble barring [29] Success probability 0.37 Normalized throughput 37% T-NORA [30] Average throughput Average access delay 2000 CRA [31] Normalized throughput 63% GF protocol [37] Success probability 0.8 NORA [4] Successful access probability 0.48 Average throughput 48% Average access delay 498 SIC-based RACH [6] Successful access probability 0. exponentially with the slot number and maximum can be attained at the last slot of the radio frame as observed in Fig. 7 (b).…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%