2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13638-016-0576-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel queue management policy for delay-tolerant networks

Abstract: Delay-tolerant networks (DTNs) have attracted increasing attention from governments, academia and industries in recent years. They are designed to provide a communication channel that exploits the inherent mobility of trams, buses and cars. However, the resulting highly dynamic network suffers from frequent disconnections, thereby making node-to-node communications extremely challenging. Researchers have thus proposed many routing/forwarding strategies in order to achieve high delivery ratios and/or low latenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(129 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this results in the network with a high overhead [10,13]. In contrast, the quota-based protocols have a low overhead, but lower delivery ratio [14]. As we will show in our simulation studies (Section 5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, this results in the network with a high overhead [10,13]. In contrast, the quota-based protocols have a low overhead, but lower delivery ratio [14]. As we will show in our simulation studies (Section 5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Because nodes in an opportunistic environment are buffer‐constrained, efficient utilization of resources (such as buffer, bandwidth, contact duration, etc.,) is necessary to achieve optimal routing performance. Even if, many of the researchers developed efficient buffer management schemes for opportunistic networks; they do not consider the selfish behaviour of the nodes in the network. Need for a new routing algorithm to address buffer‐aware selfishness …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because, autonomy of nodes is obvious in such an environment, the level of node cooperation is also important to achieve higher throughput. None of the existing algorithms are suitable for such smart opportunistic environment because of their unrealistic assumptions. Lack of real test‐bed analysis : Most of the existing algorithms evaluated their routing performance using synthetic traces and none of them conducted any test‐bed analysis in real‐life smart opportunistic network scenarios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yao et al [23] preferentially compute the utility value of caching data based on node interest and data transfer probability, and then design the overall cache management strategy including passive and proactive dropping policy, and scheduling policy. For instance, the author of [24] provides message priority information for the mobile vehicle by using the node encounter rate and context information, such as survival time, number of available copies and maximum number of forwarding message copies. However, this method is passive and nodes in the communication range can't initiatively select whether to receive the message from other nodes.…”
Section: Multiple Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%