2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2019.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel proton exchange membrane developed from clay and activated carbon derived from coconut shell for application in microbial fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the ultimate aim of manufacturing and testing SILMs for MFC is to provide promising candidates as alternatives to the Nafion PEM (proton exchange membrane), a comparative evaluation can show how far the research on and development of SILMs have reached. As a matter of fact, experiences with Nafion membranes in MFCs (acetate substrate, mixed culture as the seed source, dual-chamber configuration, and batch mode) indicate that the maximum P d could be in a similar range-14.4 [59], 17.7 [60], 38 [61,62], 43.6 [63], 57.5 [64], 65 [65], 118 [66], 126.7 [67], and 173.3 [68]-to that attainable in MFCs with SILMs (1.4-179 mW m −2 ) [23,25,33]. To extend the comparative evaluation of SILMs, it is worth taking a look at the performances of MFCs operated with membrane candidates (such as cation exchange membranes (CEM) and porous (cheap) materials) proposed to compete with Nafion.…”
Section: Outlook and Perspectives Of Silms In Mfcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the ultimate aim of manufacturing and testing SILMs for MFC is to provide promising candidates as alternatives to the Nafion PEM (proton exchange membrane), a comparative evaluation can show how far the research on and development of SILMs have reached. As a matter of fact, experiences with Nafion membranes in MFCs (acetate substrate, mixed culture as the seed source, dual-chamber configuration, and batch mode) indicate that the maximum P d could be in a similar range-14.4 [59], 17.7 [60], 38 [61,62], 43.6 [63], 57.5 [64], 65 [65], 118 [66], 126.7 [67], and 173.3 [68]-to that attainable in MFCs with SILMs (1.4-179 mW m −2 ) [23,25,33]. To extend the comparative evaluation of SILMs, it is worth taking a look at the performances of MFCs operated with membrane candidates (such as cation exchange membranes (CEM) and porous (cheap) materials) proposed to compete with Nafion.…”
Section: Outlook and Perspectives Of Silms In Mfcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage of this new type of separator could be the improved mechanical property of the system, allowing compact designs and miniaturization. Besides, another recent work (Neethu et al, 2019) proved that composite materials of biochar and terracotta can be a cost-effective alternative to Nafion®117 for microbial fuel cells, enhancing ionic hopping inside the material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, several studies and experiments have been addressed to demonstrate the effectiveness of such low performing MES systems for water and soil remediation with promising performances (Kappler et al, 2014;Prado et al, 2019;Goglio et al, 2019a;Goglio et al, 2019b;Schievano et al, 2019). Furthermore, a recent work (Neethu et al, 2019) underlined that a novel membrane developed from clay and activated carbon derived from coconut shells performed better than the Nafion® 117 membrane, doubling the power density of an MFC. This new type of membrane showed an increased proton diffusion coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen mass transfer coefficient was measured as described by Neethu et al (2019). N 2 gas was sparged to remove all the dissolved oxygen (DO) from the anolyte.…”
Section: Proton and Oxygen Mass Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%