2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel prediction equation of resting energy expenditure for Japanese septic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of some studies that assessed EE was to evaluate energy metabolism in patients with sepsis (and possibly its relationship with disease severity and prognosis), compare the results obtained by various methods or develop new predictive equations. Nine such studies were identified [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ]. In other studies, EE was measured to assess its change under the influence of the interventions tested–hyperinsulinaemic clamp [ 61 , 62 , 63 ], liberation from mechanical ventilation [ 64 ], continuous renal replacement therapy [ 65 ], early exercise [ 66 ], or cardiac selective beta adrenergic [ 67 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The purpose of some studies that assessed EE was to evaluate energy metabolism in patients with sepsis (and possibly its relationship with disease severity and prognosis), compare the results obtained by various methods or develop new predictive equations. Nine such studies were identified [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ]. In other studies, EE was measured to assess its change under the influence of the interventions tested–hyperinsulinaemic clamp [ 61 , 62 , 63 ], liberation from mechanical ventilation [ 64 ], continuous renal replacement therapy [ 65 ], early exercise [ 66 ], or cardiac selective beta adrenergic [ 67 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 14 studies compared in Table 2 , RQ was given in eight, of which six presented the data in the form of mean and standard deviation. The mean RQ presented in the studies ranged from 0.76 ± 0.12 [ 52 ] to 0.99 ± 0.06 [ 67 ] ( Figure 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…S1). First, the values considered out of the physiological range (VCO 2 < 70 mL/min or > 800 mL/min; VO 2 < 100 mL/min or > 1000 mL/min; and RQ < 0.67 or > 1.3) were excluded [ 21 – 23 ]. Second, the average values every 5 min (24 points for 2 h) in each of VCO 2 , VO 2 , and RQ were obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%