2019
DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-839-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel post-processing algorithm for Halo Doppler lidars

Abstract: Abstract. Commercially available Doppler lidars have now been proven to be efficient tools for studying winds and turbulence in the planetary boundary layer. However, in many cases low signal-to-noise ratio is still a limiting factor for utilising measurements by these devices. Here, we present a novel post-processing algorithm for Halo Stream Line Doppler lidars, which enables an improvement in sensitivity of a factor of 5 or more. This algorithm is based on improving the accuracy of the instrumental noise fl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Streamline Pro is designed without moving parts on the outside, which limits the scanning to a cone of 20° from vertical. All Stream Line variants can be used for depolarization ratio measurements, but an important difference between XR and other Stream Line versions is that the XR background noise level cannot be determined as accurately in the near range as for the non-XR versions (Vakkari et al, 2019). This difference is attributed to the more sensitive amplifier used in the Stream Line XR (Vakkari et al, 2019).…”
Section: Halo Doppler Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Streamline Pro is designed without moving parts on the outside, which limits the scanning to a cone of 20° from vertical. All Stream Line variants can be used for depolarization ratio measurements, but an important difference between XR and other Stream Line versions is that the XR background noise level cannot be determined as accurately in the near range as for the non-XR versions (Vakkari et al, 2019). This difference is attributed to the more sensitive amplifier used in the Stream Line XR (Vakkari et al, 2019).…”
Section: Halo Doppler Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A background check to determine background noise level is performed automatically once per hour. We post-processed SNR according to Vakkari et al (2019), which is essential to be able to further reduce the instrumental noise floor by averaging the SNR.…”
Section: Halo Doppler Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Halo Photonics Stream Line pulsed Doppler LiDAR [39] was located at 8 m above sea level at Utö, and a 15 • elevation angle velocity azimuth display (VAD) scan was configured with 24 azimuthal directions every 15 min. The radial resolution of the measurement was 30 m, and the integration time per beam was 7 s. Raw data were post-processed according to [40], and a signal-to-noise ratio threshold of −23 dB was applied to the radial measurements before wind retrieval from the VAD. The three first range gates were excluded from the analysis, and thus, horizontal winds were available from 35 m above sea level at a 7.8 m height resolution.…”
Section: Utömentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. The measurements were post-processed according to Vakkari et al (2019) and the attenuated backscatter (β) was calculated from signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) taking into account the telescope focus (infinity). The uncertainties in radial velocity and β were calculated according to O'Connor et al (2010).…”
Section: Halo Doppler Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%