2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2019.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel pore-size-dependent equation of state for modeling fluid phase behavior in nanopores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radius of pore-throat in the shale reservoir is mostly in the range of 1 to 100 nm, which leads to spatial confinement . The confinement effect on fluid property and transport can be attributed to two aspects: capillary pressure between liquid and gas phases, and fluid-wall interaction (i.e., fluid adsorption). , Many publications have sprung up discussing the confinement effect on phase behavior of confined fluid. On the basis of experimental studies such as nanochannel chip and differential scanning calorimetry, some scholars have observed that the critical temperature and pressure of hydrocarbons are lower in nanopores than in the bulk phase, and the difference increases gradually with the decrease of pore size . However, due to the unconventional features of shale formation and the limitations of devices (the challenge of building nanofluidic chips or high-quality nanoscale porous media models), the experimental studies on the phase behavior of shale nanopores are difficult and the accuracy of the data is uncertain .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The radius of pore-throat in the shale reservoir is mostly in the range of 1 to 100 nm, which leads to spatial confinement . The confinement effect on fluid property and transport can be attributed to two aspects: capillary pressure between liquid and gas phases, and fluid-wall interaction (i.e., fluid adsorption). , Many publications have sprung up discussing the confinement effect on phase behavior of confined fluid. On the basis of experimental studies such as nanochannel chip and differential scanning calorimetry, some scholars have observed that the critical temperature and pressure of hydrocarbons are lower in nanopores than in the bulk phase, and the difference increases gradually with the decrease of pore size . However, due to the unconventional features of shale formation and the limitations of devices (the challenge of building nanofluidic chips or high-quality nanoscale porous media models), the experimental studies on the phase behavior of shale nanopores are difficult and the accuracy of the data is uncertain .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, some recent studies focus on developing EOS that can describe the effects of confinement. , Zhang et al modified the van der Waals equation of state (vdW-EOS) by considering the effects of molecule–molecule interactions and pore size. Luo et al extended the Peng–Robinson equation of state (PR-EOS) with a fluid–pore wall interaction energy parameter to predict the transition temperatures under different pore diameters. Song et al developed a novel fluid adsorption characterization method and then presented an adsorption-dependent PR-EOS (A-PR-EOS) to study the relationship between fluid adsorption and its induced critical property shift of pure components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the system scale is reduced to the micro/nano level, the fluid behavior becomes size dependent with the enhancement of confinement effect, and the thermodynamic properties and phase equilibrium of the confined fluids are substantially changed . Many scholars from different disciplines agree that fluid confinement may change apparent physical properties, such as critical pressure and temperature, density, viscosity, surface tension, and freezing and melting temperatures. However, the trend of many physical properties shifts is still unclear, and some conflicting results occur in the predicted behavior of fluids in nanopores. For example, most of the studies suggest that confinement results in a decrease in bubble point pressure, but the change in dew point pressure is somewhat controversial. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the above experimental studies, molecular simulation is also introduced in this area (Nojabaei et al, 2013;Dong et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2019) together with density functional theory (also known as DFT) (Barbosa et al, 2016) and much more interesting and useful insights have been gathered in these theoretical and numerical studies. The classical Lennard-Jones potential is selected in the grand canonical Monte Carlo (also known as GCMC) simulation and the phase transition mechanisms in the fluid structures inside the confining geometry has been analyzed in (Thommes et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%