2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel plasma based early colorectal cancer screening assay base on methylated SDC2 and SFRP2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the sensitivities of stool SpecColon test for detecting AA, early stage (0-II) CRC and stage I-IV CRC by cut-off-2 were 53.8% (7/13) [15]. Previous studies indicated that plasma mSEPT9 test, a FDA approved assay for CRC early detection, could achieve better performance with three PCR replicates when compared with single PCR reaction [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results showed that the sensitivities of stool SpecColon test for detecting AA, early stage (0-II) CRC and stage I-IV CRC by cut-off-2 were 53.8% (7/13) [15]. Previous studies indicated that plasma mSEPT9 test, a FDA approved assay for CRC early detection, could achieve better performance with three PCR replicates when compared with single PCR reaction [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consistently, as stool DNA originated directly from AA and CRC tissues, the mSFRP2 and mSDC2 levels in stool were higher than that in plasma, thus it is reasonable that stool SpecColon test showed higher sensitivity. Nevertheless, both plasma and stool SpecColon tests showed better performance than mSEPT9 test, especially for AA and early stage CRC detection [15,23]. China has a large population of over 1.4 billion, and approximately 700 million people (age 45-80) should access CRC screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To improve the sensitivity of plasma methylated SEPT9 test, several strategies have been proposed during the recent years. Among such strategies, the combination of multiple biomarkers and/or methods has become an effective approach in CRC diagnosis and screening to improve sensitivity (Song et al, 2017;Zhao et al, 2020). For example, it was reported that the sensitivities for CRC detection were 72.2 and 68.0%, respectively, for SEPT9 methylation and FIT individually, but when test results for SEPT9 methylation and FIT were combined, CRC detection rate increased to 88.7% (Johnson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%