2023
DOI: 10.3390/pr11020454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Parallel Simulated Annealing Methodology to Solve the No-Wait Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with Earliness and Tardiness Objectives

Abstract: In this paper, the no-wait flow shop problem with earliness and tardiness objectives is considered. The problem is proven to be NP-hard. Recent no-wait flow shop problem studies focused on familiar objectives, such as makespan, total flow time, and total completion time. However, the problem has limited studies with solution approaches covering the concomitant use of earliness and tardiness objectives. A novel methodology for the parallel simulated annealing algorithm is proposed to solve this problem in order… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, this author introduced two heuristics for adjusting speed tailored to the specific problem, aiming to improve the quality of the non-dominated solutions acquired. Karacan et al 46 thoroughly examined the NWFSSP with the primary aim of optimizing both earliness (E) and tardiness (TT) objectives. To tackle this intricate challenge, he introduced a novel perspective on enhancing the parallel simulated annealing algorithm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, this author introduced two heuristics for adjusting speed tailored to the specific problem, aiming to improve the quality of the non-dominated solutions acquired. Karacan et al 46 thoroughly examined the NWFSSP with the primary aim of optimizing both earliness (E) and tardiness (TT) objectives. To tackle this intricate challenge, he introduced a novel perspective on enhancing the parallel simulated annealing algorithm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%