2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.119215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel palladium(II) antitumor agent: Synthesis, characterization, DFT perspective, CT-DNA and BSA interaction studies via in-vitro and in-silico approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow time was measured using a digital stopwatch and each sample was tested three times to get accurate outcomes. The relative viscosity was determined using the following relation 45 where ƞ and ƞ o defines the viscosities of DNA in the presence and absence of 4g respectively, t DNA is the average flow time of pure DNA, t complex is the average flow time of DNA in the presence of 4g at varying concentration, and t o be the flow time of Tris–HCl buffer 46 . If a ligand binds via intercalary mode an increase in viscosity will be observed however, no effect on viscosity will be detected in case of groove binders 47 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow time was measured using a digital stopwatch and each sample was tested three times to get accurate outcomes. The relative viscosity was determined using the following relation 45 where ƞ and ƞ o defines the viscosities of DNA in the presence and absence of 4g respectively, t DNA is the average flow time of pure DNA, t complex is the average flow time of DNA in the presence of 4g at varying concentration, and t o be the flow time of Tris–HCl buffer 46 . If a ligand binds via intercalary mode an increase in viscosity will be observed however, no effect on viscosity will be detected in case of groove binders 47 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UV-Vis spectra demonstrate four bands at 313 (log ε = 1.43), 305 (1.45), 248 (3.84) and 202 (2.92) may be assigned to intraligand π → π* and n → π* transition of CSS − group and 2,2-bipyridine ligand. Molar conductivity 123 cm 2 ohm −1 mol −1 illustrating 1:1 electrolyte [36]. Figure 1 shows the proposed reaction pathway for the above procedure followed by characterization data.…”
Section: 2'-bipyridinepyrrolinedithiocarbamatopalladium(ii) Nitrate C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tris-HCl buffer was prepared using deionized, triple distilled water. The solution of CT-DNA in the buffer gave a 2 -1 ratio of UV-Visible absorption at 260 and 280 nm, [18], meaning that the DNA was sufficiently free of protein. The concentration of DNA was measured by spectrophotometry (ε = 6,600 mol.dm -3 .cm -1 ) [26].…”
Section: Materials and Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it was reported that the positive shift (anodic shift) in formal potential is caused by the intercalation of the cationic drug into the double helical structure of DNA, while negative shift is observed for the electrostatic interaction of the cationic drug with the anionic phosphate of DNA backbone [50,51]. The obvious negative peak potential shift (cathodic shift) in the CV behavior of complex (1) by the addition of DNA suggests an electrostatic interaction of complex (1) with the [18], but with much stronger binding affinity, due to hydrogen bonding of glycine to the electronegative sites of DNA. Wherase, the positive shift in formal potential of complex (2) (i.e from E1/2 (-685 mV) to E1/2 (-628 mV)) supports our previous inference for intercalation binding mode of complex (2), where the cyclobutane ring undergo stacking interaction with the sugar group of the bound DNA as previously proposed and form hydrophobic contact with the purine rings of IMP and GMP.…”
Section: Cyclic Voltammetry Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation