2018
DOI: 10.1109/tnsm.2017.2778106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Optimal Mapping Algorithm With Less Computational Complexity for Virtual Network Embedding

Abstract: A novel optimal mapping algorithm with less computational complexity for virtual network embedding Abstract-Virtual Network Embedding (VNE) problem has been widely accepted as an important aspect in Network Virtualization (NV) area: how to efficiently embed virtual networks, with node and link resource demands, onto the shared substrate network that has finite network resources. Previous VNE heuristic algorithms, only considering single network topology attribute and local resources of each node, may lead to i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the proposed algorithm GAL with three best performance algorithms, which solve the VONs mapping problem, denoted by CAN-A, LCSD and GRC-SVNE, respectively. CAN-A, LCSD and GRC-SVNE denote the algorithms of proposed in literature [4], literature [6] and literature [50], respectively. CAN-A algorithm lies in constructing the candidate substrate node subset and the candidate substrate path subset before embedding.…”
Section: A Parameters Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the proposed algorithm GAL with three best performance algorithms, which solve the VONs mapping problem, denoted by CAN-A, LCSD and GRC-SVNE, respectively. CAN-A, LCSD and GRC-SVNE denote the algorithms of proposed in literature [4], literature [6] and literature [50], respectively. CAN-A algorithm lies in constructing the candidate substrate node subset and the candidate substrate path subset before embedding.…”
Section: A Parameters Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the Z ratio represents the average number of additional links or number of slave nodes per virtual network. e curves of ProactiveP If |Neigh| �� speedup do (6) Remove the node with the lowest CPU value from Neigh (7) Sum � Sum-CPU (the node with the lowest CPU value) (8) End if (9) add P[j] to Neigh in Figures 3 and 4 are smoother and higher than the other two because the algorithm maps each virtual node to multiple substrate nodes regardless of the actual situation of network resources. e reason why the two curves of EPVNE in Figures 3 and 4 are higher than that of LazyP is that the acceptance rate of EPVNE is high.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network virtualization technology allows multiple virtual heterogeneous networks to coexist on top of a shared underlying physical network infrastructure. Each virtual network is a piece of resources of the underlying physical network, which consists of virtual nodes (for example, virtual routers and cloud computing center) and virtual links provider (ISP) into two separate entities: infrastructure provider (InP) and service provider (SP) [8,9]. In such a network environment, an infrastructure provider manages a substrate network (SN), which is composed of substrate nodes and physical communication links.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to accelerate the convergence speed and avoid sucking in local optimal solution [25], we must consider not only the embedding sequence of virtual nodes but also the selection of substrate nodes to be embedded. Therefore, before our embedding process, virtual nodes are first ranked in an appropriate mapping sequence.…”
Section: Topology-oriented Vne Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%