2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel optical sensor for uranium determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, although on-site and realtime detection of uranium is difficult (21), it is also the most desirable for assessing uranium contamination problems and the effectiveness of remediation strategies. Chemical and biological sensors for UO 2 2ϩ , although available, cannot match the above instrumental analysis methods in sensitivity or selectivity (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Perhaps the most challenging aspect of this sensor design is selectivity over Th(IV), because Th(IV) almost always coexists with uranium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, although on-site and realtime detection of uranium is difficult (21), it is also the most desirable for assessing uranium contamination problems and the effectiveness of remediation strategies. Chemical and biological sensors for UO 2 2ϩ , although available, cannot match the above instrumental analysis methods in sensitivity or selectivity (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Perhaps the most challenging aspect of this sensor design is selectivity over Th(IV), because Th(IV) almost always coexists with uranium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we mentioned previously, so far, several rapid methods including colorimetric sensors [8,9,22], fluorescent sensor [21] and magnetoelastic sensor [23] have been developed for detecting UO 2 2+ . In comparison with previous colorimetric sensors [8,9,22], the proposed biosensor has higher sensitivity, similar or more excellent selectivity and short analysis time. Compared to the previous fluorescent sensor [21], the proposed biosensor is more simple and cost-effective although the sensitivity and selectivity of both are similar.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously mentioned limitations of traditional techniques have pushed researchers to develop novel methods for the rapid, sensitive and specific detection of uranyl ion in the field. Along this goal, a few chemical sensors have been developed for the rapid detection of UO 2 2+ [8][9][10]. However, these methods have lower sensitivity and relatively poor selectivity, which do not meet the requirement of rapid and on-site detection of trace UO 2 2+ in aqueous environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other advantages include simple and low cost preparation, ease of miniaturization, possibility of remote, in situ monitoring and no need for separate reference devices. 18,19 These features make optochemical sensors as a powerful tool for environmental and industrial process monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%