2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.08.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel nonlinear modeling for the prediction of blast-induced airblast using a modified conjugate FR method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They indicated the performance of multiple regression was better than simple regression ones in forecasting the BTS. Researchers of this field of study have proposed not only several empirical models, but also lots of intelligent systems to solve science and engineering problems (e.g., Singh et al [34]; Yılmaz and Yuksek [35]; Hajihassani et al [36]; Koopialipoor et al [37]; Nilashi et al [38]; Milovančević et al [39]; Roy et al [40]; Roy and Singh [41]; Keshtegar et al [42]), particularly the geotechnical engineering ones (e.g., Mohamad et al [43]; Nanda et al [44]). Furthermore, right to the point we are focused in this study, a number of studies can be found in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They indicated the performance of multiple regression was better than simple regression ones in forecasting the BTS. Researchers of this field of study have proposed not only several empirical models, but also lots of intelligent systems to solve science and engineering problems (e.g., Singh et al [34]; Yılmaz and Yuksek [35]; Hajihassani et al [36]; Koopialipoor et al [37]; Nilashi et al [38]; Milovančević et al [39]; Roy et al [40]; Roy and Singh [41]; Keshtegar et al [42]), particularly the geotechnical engineering ones (e.g., Mohamad et al [43]; Nanda et al [44]). Furthermore, right to the point we are focused in this study, a number of studies can be found in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By computing RMSE and MAE, the lower values represent the more accurate models, while higher NSE and d values indicate higher agreement predictions for a model. Therefore, the lowest values for error comparative factors, i.e., RMSE and MAE, and the highest agreement factor, i.e., d and NSE coefficients, can be used to select a model with superior prediction from among the other modeling approaches (77)(78)(79)(80)(81)(82)(83)(84)(85)(86)(87).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been employed in several natural catastrophe circumstances including the estimation of groundwater potentiality (Manap et al, 2014), to estimate the blastinduced air-blast (Keshtegar et al 2019), landslide susceptibility mapping (Lee and Pradhan 2007;Mondal and Maiti 2013), and flood susceptibility mapping (Lee et al, 2012;Rahamti et al 2015;Khosravi et al 2016). The advantage of this model is that it is easy to apply and gives totally understood outcomes (Ozdemir and Altural 2013).…”
Section: Frequency Ratio Methods (Fr)mentioning
confidence: 99%