2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-019-00987-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel nipple–areola complex involvement predictive index for indicating nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each factor had a score of 0 or 1, and the total scores were used to categorize patients into low (0–3), intermediate (4), or high (5–7) risk groups. It was recommended that the nipple should be be sacrificed in patients in the high-risk group and that patients in the intermediate-risk group who hoped to preserve the nipple should be undergo frozen section examination ( 14 ). Another study by Wang et al proposed a model consisting of tumor location, nuclear grade, and HER2 expression ( 34 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each factor had a score of 0 or 1, and the total scores were used to categorize patients into low (0–3), intermediate (4), or high (5–7) risk groups. It was recommended that the nipple should be be sacrificed in patients in the high-risk group and that patients in the intermediate-risk group who hoped to preserve the nipple should be undergo frozen section examination ( 14 ). Another study by Wang et al proposed a model consisting of tumor location, nuclear grade, and HER2 expression ( 34 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published studies have revealed a low incidence of local cancer recurrence after NSM in selected patients ( 8 13 ). Nevertheless, the preservation of the nipple remains a matter of concern due to occult nipple involvement (NI) ( 14 ). Thus, it is critical to develop clinical models to accurately predict occult nipple involvement for carrying out NSM effectively and safely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the predictive model A recent study produced a preoperative predictive model using seven factors,including MRI tumor size≥4cm, mammographic TND 1cm,MRI TND 1cm MRI nipple enhancement,central tumor,multicentric/multifocal, clinical node involvement.Each factor scores 0 or 1 point,and the total scores were categorized into low (0-3), intermediate (4), or high (5-7) risk group.Patients in high risk group were recommended to sacri ce the NAC,and patients in the intermediate risk group who hoped to preserve NAC could undertake the frozen section examination [33].Besides,another study by Wang at al proposed a model consisting of tumor location, nuclear grade,and HER2 expression [28].Schecter at al reported a formula for predicting NAC involvement based on tumor size,TND and stage,which was found to have a sensitivity of 92%, speci city of 77% [34].The models developed in these studies are basing on more costly image testing or preoperative biopsy.The factors including pathological TND,tumor size,number of metastatic lymph node,HER2 overexpression were generally known after surgery.Whereas,parameters of the predictive model in our study are much more easier to obtain.Basing on ultrasound tumor size,tumor location,and nipple signs,a predictive model were proposed to provide the possibility of NAC involvement.We found breast cancer patients with abnormal nipple signs,in central location, and tumor size 4cm,were most likely to develope NAC involvement (95.4%);patients with normal nipple signs,tumor in peripheral location,and tumor size ≤4cm had a lowest possibility(4.1%) of NAC involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hirohito et al 16 also measured the TND, and considering other factors such as the tumor size, location (central versus peripheral), nipple enhancement by MRI, multicentric/multifocal cancer, and clinical node involvement created an index to help choose appropriate candidates for NSM. According to these criteria, NAC involvement rate was determined to be 3.5% in low-risk, 68.7% in intermediate-risk, and 90% in high-risk specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%