2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel nest hybridization chain reaction based electrochemical assay for sensitive detection of circulating tumor DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to our study, the fastest ctDNA biosensor we found at a response time of 65 min for a 69 basepair long sequence. 27 Other studies use shorter DNA sequences as models of ctDNA and have response times of the order of 1.5 to 5.5 h. [28][29][30] The specicity of the biosensor was explored using the long ctDNA (101 nucleotides) strands by investigating single point mutation of the NSCLC-related sequence. The average changes of (50.7 AE 3.7)% and (6.6 AE 4.2)% decrease in the current were observed aer hybridization with 20 nM complementary ctDNA target and single mismatched 101 nucleotide ctDNA sequence (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to our study, the fastest ctDNA biosensor we found at a response time of 65 min for a 69 basepair long sequence. 27 Other studies use shorter DNA sequences as models of ctDNA and have response times of the order of 1.5 to 5.5 h. [28][29][30] The specicity of the biosensor was explored using the long ctDNA (101 nucleotides) strands by investigating single point mutation of the NSCLC-related sequence. The average changes of (50.7 AE 3.7)% and (6.6 AE 4.2)% decrease in the current were observed aer hybridization with 20 nM complementary ctDNA target and single mismatched 101 nucleotide ctDNA sequence (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal of this biosensor was enhanced through hybridization chain reaction (HCR) that took place on a gold electrode’s surface, while the HCR products were biotinylated and detected by streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase through biotin–streptavidin interaction. The sensor’s characteristics were >1.5 h of analysis time, about 17 h of fabrication time, quite good specificity, and LOD of 3 pM, but no multiplexing or universality potential [ 33 ]. In an effort to enhance the hybridization efficiency and specificity, Das et al, (2019 and 2016) developed an electrochemical sensor that uses combinatorial DNA probes or clutch probes and PNA clamps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrochemical approaches were among the very first methods applied for the detection of mutational hot spots [ 25 , 109 , 110 , 111 ] and methylation marks [ 112 , 113 , 114 ], attracting attention because of their high sensitivity, multiplexing ability, fast response, low cost, and simple setup [ 115 ]. These devices could be combined with isothermal methods for DNA amplification while keeping the system simple [ 116 ]. An ISFET (ion-sensitive field effect transistor) sensor that is mainly used for pH measurement as a chemical sensor was utilized to detect PIK3CA mutations by monitoring hydrogen ion generation during the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of DNA samples of breast cancer cell lines ( Figure 4 D) [ 117 ].…”
Section: Recent Technology Advances For Studying Cell-released Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%