2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel needle trap sorbent based on carbon nanotube-sol–gel for microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from aquatic media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, for the design of an optimized preconcentration system, there is a lack of understanding how the nanotube structure affects sorption properties, which is necessary for the development of an optimized extraction system. In this regard, multi-walled carbon nanotubes have been proven to be powerful adsorbents for extracting pollutants [25] such as PAH from water samples [26][27][28] One of the major drawbacks when working with CNT is their strong tendency for aggregation. The highly polarizable nanotubes readily form bundles (or ropes) consisting of many nanotubes bound together by van der Waals forces, making it difficult to use them as individual species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for the design of an optimized preconcentration system, there is a lack of understanding how the nanotube structure affects sorption properties, which is necessary for the development of an optimized extraction system. In this regard, multi-walled carbon nanotubes have been proven to be powerful adsorbents for extracting pollutants [25] such as PAH from water samples [26][27][28] One of the major drawbacks when working with CNT is their strong tendency for aggregation. The highly polarizable nanotubes readily form bundles (or ropes) consisting of many nanotubes bound together by van der Waals forces, making it difficult to use them as individual species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c Limits of detection, polypyrrole sorbent, HS-SPDE-GC-MS [27] d Limits of detection, polypyrrole coating, SPME-GC-MS [28] e Limits of detection, PDMS coating (0.01 cm film thickness), SPME-GC-MS [29] f Limits of detection, CNT/silica composite, NTE-GC-MS [30] g Relative standard deviation, polypyrrole sorbent, HS-SPDE-GC-MS [32] h Relative standard deviation, polypyrrole coating, SPME-GC-MS [23] i Relative standard deviation, PDMS coating (0.01 cm film thickness), SPME-GC-MS [24] j Limits of detection, CNT/silica composite, SPME-GC-MS [30] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the K fh value decreases with rising temperature while the K hs enhances. It also implies that there is a potential compensation between the lower K fh and higher K hs in a temperature-dependent extraction process [32,33]. In addition, increase in temperature accelerates the evaporation of liquid into headspace and hence the sorption on the surface of sorbent.…”
Section: Extraction Temperaturementioning
confidence: 97%