2012
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/46/465707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel nano-scale non-contact temperature measurement technique for crystalline materials

Abstract: A new high spatial resolution non-contact temperature measurement technique (thermal scanning electron microscopy, ThSEM) is demonstrated. It employs temperature dependent thermal diffuse scattering in electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Unlike conventional scanning thermal microscopy, which uses contact probes, ThSEM is a non-contact method. In contrast to optical temperature mapping techniques, ThSEM does not have the spatial resolution limitation that arises from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows the result of intensity traces across a (400) Kikuchi line in an EBSD pattern recorded from a Si(001) sample with 20 keV electrons in a JEOL 840 SEM [5]. As expected, the intensity of the excess Kikuchi line decreases monotonically with increasing temperature, while the intensity of diffuse scattering increases.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2 shows the result of intensity traces across a (400) Kikuchi line in an EBSD pattern recorded from a Si(001) sample with 20 keV electrons in a JEOL 840 SEM [5]. As expected, the intensity of the excess Kikuchi line decreases monotonically with increasing temperature, while the intensity of diffuse scattering increases.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The spatial resolution we have estimated from the 20 keV beam used for these experiments is c. 80 nm; employing finely focused low energy electron beams in a state-of-the-art field emission instrument should enable 10 nm resolution to be attained. We estimate the temperature sensitivity from our measurements to be [5][6][7][8][9][10] o C. Most importantly, while other techniques such as scanning thermal microscopy have comparable spatial resolution and nominally better temperature sensitivity, the over-arching advantage of the current technique is that is essentially non-contact. This is a crucial advantage in making temperature measurements of nanoscale objects, such that the act of measurement itself does not substantially modify the local temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such samples, several material parameters change with temperature which could plausibly contribute to a change in SE emission, such as the work function, [16][17][18] electronic bandgap, 19 and populations of phonons which can scatter SEs, although identifying and elucidating the specific mechanism(s) is beyond the scope of this study. 20 TEM bright field images 8 and SEM EBSD patterns 9 are also known to depend weakly on temperature due to thermal diffuse scattering (the Debye-Waller effect), which can also be understood as temperature-dependent electron scattering.…”
Section: Secondary Electron Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar thermal-diffuse scattering mechanism has shown β ∼ 10 −4 K −1 in the electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) pattern in an SEM. 9 In contrast to those more specialized imaging modes, SEM using secondary electrons (SEs) is the most commonly used imaging mode but has not previously been applied to measure temperature. Although not performed in an SEM, several past studies using electron beams have reported small temperature effects on SE yield in Ge, 10 MgO, 11 and four magnetic metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to precisely map the physical parameters and gradients, the spatial resolution of the temperature sensor has to be as high as possible. There are two main temperature field mapping methods in use which can achieve a spatial resolution of less than a millimeter: thermometry based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [1] and electron backscatter diffraction [4]. However, they are not suitable for in situ measurement in many applications due to their large size and electromagnetic interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%