A Novel Multirobot System for Plant Phenotyping

Abstract

Phenotypic studies require large datasets for accurate inference and prediction. Collecting plant data in a farm can be very labor intensive and costly. This paper presents the design, architecture (hardware and software) and deployment of a multi-robot system for row crop field data collection. The proposed system has been deployed in a soybean research farm at Iowa State University.Robotics 2018, 7, 61 2 of 15 Several agricultural robots have been developed in the recent past. Unlike industrial robots, the challenges for robots in agriculture are diverse. First, agricultural fields do not have a structured and controlled environment, in contrast to industrial facilities. Second, agricultural robots operate on farms with infrastructure and operating conditions different from industrial robots. Third, industrial processes can be designed by modules to complete particular tasks by a particular robot, whereas the complex tasks in agriculture sometimes cannot be split into simple actions. Due to the aforestated reasons, agricultural applications require more versatile and robust robots.One of the earliest robots deployed in agricultural applications was the German BoniRob [6]. This robot was initially developed by AMAZONEN-WERKE (Hasbergen, Germany) together with the Osnabruck University of Applied Sciences, Robert Bosch GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany) and other partners, and is now a part of Deepfield Robotics, a Bosch start-up company (Stuttgart, Germany). BoniRob was developed to eliminate some of the most tedious tasks in modern farming, plant breeding, and weeding. Another agricultural application example was RHEA [7]. It was a automatic and robotic systems with a fleet of heterogeneous ground and aerial robots developed for effective weed and pest control. Many universities have developed their own robots, for example, the multi-purpose Small Robotic Farm Vehicle (SRFV) from Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia [8]. This modular design allows the SRFV to undertake a range of agricultural tasks and experiments, including harvesting, seeding, fertilizing and weeding management. Another example is the Thorvald II [9], a completely modular platform both on the hardware and the software side. It can be reconfigured to obtain the necessary physical properties to operate in different production systems, for example, tunnels, greenhouses and open fields. Another example of a university-developed agricultural robot is the Phenobot 1.0 [10] from Iowa State University. It is an auto-steered and self-propelled field-based phenotyping platform for tall dense canopy crops.Companies that work on commercial robots exists as well. For the open field, there is the ANATIS from Carre, the Robotti from AGROINTELLI and Asterix from Adigo [11]. Ecorobotix is developing a solar powered robot for ecological and economical weeding of row crops, meadows and intercropping cultures, while Naio technologies has developed the robots OZ, BOB, TED and DINO. Other robots are designed for greenhouses. One example is the fully-auto...

Deconstructing the genetic architecture of iron deficiency chlorosis in soybean using genome-wide approaches

“…Leveraging genomicsenabled approaches to study iron deficiency chlorosis is essential for future soybean improvement programsunder multiple objectives [80]. Genome wide studies will benefit from digital and automated phenotyping [81,82,83]. Also, markers reported in this study might help in future soybean genomic studies.…”

Soybean Root System Architecture Trait Study through Genotypic, Phenotypic, and Shape-Based Clusters

“…Root trait research requires infusion of analytics, such as leveraging advanced sensors coupled with computer vision and ML-based feature extraction methods [72][73][74][75][76][77]. Finally, robotics-assisted phenotyping is transforming above ground trait studies [78], and there is a need for robotics-based phenotyping solution for end-to-end phenotyping platforms and root excavation without information loss. Unlike above ground traits, root systems still 18 Plant Phenomics do not have well-described growth stages and are often described by corresponding length or depth which lacks the inclusion of development stages [79,80].…”

Development of Optimized Phenomic Predictors for Efficient Plant Breeding Decisions Using Phenomic-Assisted Selection in Soybean

“…High-throughput phenomics has been proposed as a solution to lessen the throughput capacity, mechanical, and resource limitations that exist in plant breeding programs associated with phenotyping [7]. Studies have shown high correlation between phenomic traits collected using digital sensors and manually collected measurements [8,9] suggesting phenomic data can be acquired on a wide spatiotemporal scale by leveraging the technological advancements made in sensor technology with ground and aerial-based phenotyping platforms [10]. Empowered with phenomic data that was previously difficult or impossible to collect across an expansive spatiotemporal scale, scientists have begun disentangling the genetic architecture of traits through genomic studies [8,11,12], prediction of target trait performance using genomic [13][14][15][16], and phenomic prediction strategies [9,15,[17][18][19][20].…”