2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel multi-scale domain overlapping CFD/STH coupling methodology for multi-dimensional flows relevant to nuclear applications

Abstract: A novel multi-scale domain overlapping coupling methodology designed to couple a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code with a system thermal hydraulic (STH) code was developed and its performance was investigated. The methodology has been implemented in the coupling infrastructure code Janus, developed at the University of Michigan, providing methods for the on-the-fly data transfer through memory between the commercial CFD code STAR-CCM+ and the US NRC best-estimate thermal hydraulic system code TRACE. Coup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The updated boundary conditions of STAR‐CCM+ first come from a complete step of TRACE and then its fine fields are used to calculate the new closure coefficients for TRACE, forcing which produce CFD‐like TH distributions in the entire overlapped domain. This coupled pair works well for both 1D and 3D system models. And as a supplement to the correlation for convective and form‐friction pressure drops in RELAP5/FLUENT, the initial effect was also well‐examined and eliminated from the total pressure drop from STAR‐CCM+ to counteract the non‐erasable initial pressure drop in TRACE motion equation.…”
Section: A Review Of the Multiscale Thermal‐hydraulic Coupled Codesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The updated boundary conditions of STAR‐CCM+ first come from a complete step of TRACE and then its fine fields are used to calculate the new closure coefficients for TRACE, forcing which produce CFD‐like TH distributions in the entire overlapped domain. This coupled pair works well for both 1D and 3D system models. And as a supplement to the correlation for convective and form‐friction pressure drops in RELAP5/FLUENT, the initial effect was also well‐examined and eliminated from the total pressure drop from STAR‐CCM+ to counteract the non‐erasable initial pressure drop in TRACE motion equation.…”
Section: A Review Of the Multiscale Thermal‐hydraulic Coupled Codesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This new approach paved the way for new universal multiscale analysis tool for the nuclear reactor applications. It is able to handle both 1D and 3D cases . In connection with this work, the domain decomposition and overlapping methods are discussed in detail.…”
Section: A Review Of the Multiscale Thermal‐hydraulic Coupled Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that this domain overlapping approach differs from the domain overlapping approach in the literature for system code and CFD code coupling, such as TRACE and STAR-CCM+ [26] or SAM and NekRS [27]. The key aspect of the overlapping-domain coupling is that for a given portion of the system that is modeled by both codes, i.e.…”
Section: Domain Overlapping Coupling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of coupling different simulation packages/methodologies has been widely used in nuclear applications, an important example of which is the coupling between 1-D system/sub-channel codes and CFD (Aumiller et al, 2001;Bandini et al, 2015;Bavière et al, 2014;Bertolotto et al, 2009;Bury, 2013;Gibeling and Mahaffy, 2002;Grunloh and Manera, 2017, Papukchiev et al, 2009Pialla et al, 2015;Toti et al, 2017). In such approaches, the 1-D code, which has normally been validated against numerous engineering data and experiences, provides reasonable boundary conditions for the CFD models so that they can be used more efficiently to account for some key components/parts with complex 3-D phenomena and/or flow transients that cannot be well represented by the 1-D approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%