2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel model of pressure drop for airflow penetrating randomly packed cylindrical particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PRCFD can directly obtain the pressure drop of the bed, with an average error of less than 8% compared to the experiment. The PRCFD considers several factors, including particle shape, wall effects, internal friction, and the sudden expansion and contraction of the flow channel during fluid flow, which resulted in more accurate pressure drop outcomes (Rezvani et al, 2015; Zhang, Xia, et al, 2022; Zhang, Zhang, et al, 2022). The HCM underestimated the pressure drop at higher inlet velocities, resulting in an average deviation of 21% from the experimental values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The PRCFD can directly obtain the pressure drop of the bed, with an average error of less than 8% compared to the experiment. The PRCFD considers several factors, including particle shape, wall effects, internal friction, and the sudden expansion and contraction of the flow channel during fluid flow, which resulted in more accurate pressure drop outcomes (Rezvani et al, 2015; Zhang, Xia, et al, 2022; Zhang, Zhang, et al, 2022). The HCM underestimated the pressure drop at higher inlet velocities, resulting in an average deviation of 21% from the experimental values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grain bin was equipped with a centrifugal fan and a dedicated air accurate pressure drop outcomes (Rezvani et al, 2015;Zhang, Xia, et al, 2022;. The HCM underestimated the pressure drop at higher inlet velocities, resulting in an average deviation of 21% from the experimental values.…”
Section: Pilot-scale Validation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7,8 Extensive experimental research and hydrodynamic models have been proposed to guide the design of superior packings. 3,9 For example, Billet et al proposed correlation models for estimating the pressure drop and liquid holdup in vertical pipe flow by considering the balance of liquid microelement gravity and friction force on the surface of packing 10 ; Delft et al developed hydrodynamic models by examining liquid film flow on the surface of inclined wavy plates, categorizing hydrodynamic performance into gas-liquid interactions, gasgas interactions, and alterations in airflow direction 11,12 ; SRP models establish the connection between hydrodynamic performance and mass transfer performance by predicting the pressure drop, liquid holdup, and effective interface area. 13,14 These experimental results and models have been widely applied in developing packings, designing columns, and simulating processes (i.e., Aspen, Fluent, and computational fluid dynamic).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%