A novel method of reverse engineering using axiomatic design

Lee, Se-Jung; Park, Gyung-Jin

doi:10.1007/s12206-013-1124-5

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Professor Suh proposed Axiomatic Design (AD) in 1976 [14,15]. This theoretical approach aims to establish design specifications quantitatively, assisting designers in enhancing the logic and systematics of problem analysis [16].…”

Section: Axiomatic Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Product innovation design process combined Kano and TRIZ with AD: Case study

Rong,

Liu,

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the era of rapid product iteration, companies need simple and effective methods to guide the entire process of product innovation design and enhance their product innovation capabilities. Most research focused on improving one or several steps in the product design process. Although some scholars have proposed methods that guided the entire process, they combined more than three different theories, which increased the difficulty of theoretical learning and the complexity of practical implementation. This paper proposed a product innovation design process composed of three theoretical methods: Kano, Axiomatic Design (AD), and Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems (TRIZ). This new process guided the entire product design process with fewer theoretical methods, reducing the difficulty of learning and implementation. The paper demonstrated the effectiveness of this method through the design practice of a portable two-wheeled self-balancing vehicle. Additionally, the discussion section explored the method’s potential from the design management perspective.

show abstract

Section: Axiomatic Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Product innovation design process combined Kano and TRIZ with AD: Case study

Rong,

Liu,

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, this needs to be accomplished without the benefit of any closely aligned prior art and its documentation. In reverse-engineering any given product, the iterative, top-down, forward flow between FR→DP is reversed into an iterative, bottom-up, FR←DP reverse flow [24][25][26]. In the case of nature's designs, the fundamental problem that exists in regard to the above reverse engineering exercise is that of hydrating natures FR←DP hierarchies in a bottom-up sense.…”

Section: Fig 9 Design Matrix and Evolutionary Dynamicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nature's Design's: The Biology of Survival

Mantri

Thomas

2019

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Life has existed on earth for at least 3.95 billion years. All along, the flame of life has been successfully passed on from generation to generation, and species to species across an immense temporal span. This includes at least five mass-extinction events that wiped out over 70% of all species in each such biotic crisis. Against such immense odds, life has learned to thrive despite repeat assaults. And the ingenuity embedded within natures designs has been an integral part of this inspiring story. For example, the ancient bacterial flagellum is powered by the Mot Complex which is part of a perfectly circular nanoscale rotary engine. It is obvious that nature came upon the wheel much before human arrival (i.e., at least as far back as 2.7 billion years). Many are the design lessons that may be gleaned from studying nature. This paper looks at the immense evolutionary design-laboratory that nature evolves its designs within, and frames it alongside an Axiomatic/Complex-Adaptive/Stigmergic Systems perspective.

show abstract

“…AD 19,20 is a general design framework based on two axioms: the independent axiom and the information axiom, which gives the standard of a good design in a logical and objective way. The wide scope of AD makes it valuable in any functionally driven design context, especially in the conceptual design, which has been applied to many fields, such as system design, 21 product design, 22,23 manufacturing design, [24][25][26] etc.…”

Section: Preliminarymentioning

confidence: 99%

Tolerance specification of the plane feature based on the axiomatic design

Zhao

Cao

Liu

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tolerance specification involves selecting tolerance types for functional or assembly features to control the variation of features. General methods tend to formulate a frame to specify all the features of part, while the specification methods or reasoning rules for specific feature (point, line, plane, cylinder, etc.) are less studied. This paper focuses on the tolerance-type selection of the plane feature. The theory of axiomatic design is introduced to select the tolerance type for the plane feature, and the problem is interpreted as a redundant decoupled design. To achieve the functional requirements, design parameters and constraints of physics domain are determined. The mapping rules, which are between design parameters and functional requirements, are generated based on the independent axiom. Considering the large number of solutions of the design, the constraints such as cost and inspection methods are introduced to reduce the number of solutions. The minimum information axiom is introduced for the optimum mapping rules and the tolerance types are selected by the optimum mapping rules for the plane feature. Finally, the specification process is concluded and demonstrated by means of an example.

show abstract

A novel method of reverse engineering using axiomatic design

Cited by 9 publications

References 19 publications

Product innovation design process combined Kano and TRIZ with AD: Case study

Product innovation design process combined Kano and TRIZ with AD: Case study

Nature's Design's: The Biology of Survival

Tolerance specification of the plane feature based on the axiomatic design

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About