2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Method of Automatic Plant Species Identification Using Sparse Representation of Leaf Tooth Features

Abstract: Automatic species identification has many advantages over traditional species identification. Currently, most plant automatic identification methods focus on the features of leaf shape, venation and texture, which are promising for the identification of some plant species. However, leaf tooth, a feature commonly used in traditional species identification, is ignored. In this paper, a novel automatic species identification method using sparse representation of leaf tooth features is proposed. In this method, im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Solving the constrained LASSO problem [17], we obtain the sparse coefficients and calculate the residuals for each candidate class. Finally, the test sample is classified into the class with the smallest residual.…”
Section: Experiments and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solving the constrained LASSO problem [17], we obtain the sparse coefficients and calculate the residuals for each candidate class. Finally, the test sample is classified into the class with the smallest residual.…”
Section: Experiments and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods [21][22] [23] use a combination of leaf tooth features and non-leaf tooth features; the focus of this study is only on the leaf teeth features, so the comparison method is based on the selection proposed in [20]. A leaf identification method identifies features such as total area of teeth, internal angles, number of teeth, and total length of outer edges.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study on leaf shape, Xiaofeng et al used Hu geometric moment and Zernike vertical distance to measure the shape of an input leaf image for automatic leaf classification [17]; Du et al extracted eight characteristics such as the aspect ratio, rectangular and convex area of the leaf, convex perimeter ratio, sphericity, roundness, eccentricity, and shape factor [18]. In a study on leaf edge, Zheng et al extracted the leaf edge by using the Harris and SUSAN algorithm and calculated three characteristic parameters: leaf edge sawtooth number, sharpness, and skewness [19]; Corney automatically acquired the shape and size of the leaf tooth by identifying the tooth on the leaf edge [20]; Jin proposed a method for classifying plant leaves using the sparse matrix of leaf tooth features [21]; Chen used the ratio between the internal distance of the leaf and the Euclidean distance to represent the local concavity and convexity of leaves [22], and classified the whole edge, tooth edge, wave edge, and leaf crack edge; Li used data dimensionality and character weighted semi-supervised clustering algorithm to identify the leaf by synthesizing leaf shape, leaf edge, texture, and other characteristics, which could be used for several applications [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 102 images were taken from four species’ and the best 80 were used in this study. According to previous studies, [30, 31], we decided to use half of our digital images for training and the other half for testing the system. 10 images of each species were selected as training set and 10 were used as testing set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%