2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-0934(03)00061-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for the titration of recombinant virus stocks by ELISPOT assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sera were classified for neutralizing activity as described in Section 3.6. Cheong et al (2003) used an ELISPOT approach to titer stocks of a recombinant virus expressing human IL-2 by plating infected cells onto anti-IL-2 Ab coated ELI-SPOT plates. In a novel application for a neutralization assay for the SARS coronavirus, an ELISPOT analyzer was used to count whole cells actually growing on ELISPOT plate membranes and infected with a pseudovirus, which also encoded a Lac Z gene that made cells blue upon staining with X-gal (Han et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sera were classified for neutralizing activity as described in Section 3.6. Cheong et al (2003) used an ELISPOT approach to titer stocks of a recombinant virus expressing human IL-2 by plating infected cells onto anti-IL-2 Ab coated ELI-SPOT plates. In a novel application for a neutralization assay for the SARS coronavirus, an ELISPOT analyzer was used to count whole cells actually growing on ELISPOT plate membranes and infected with a pseudovirus, which also encoded a Lac Z gene that made cells blue upon staining with X-gal (Han et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vector titres were determined by an ELISPOT assay and are expressed as transducing units (t.u.) (Cheong et al, 2003). A slight increase in vector production was observed (two-to threefold) at day 1 after transfection in hypoxia (6 % O 2 ), but titres remained lower than those produced in standard conditions (day 3, 20 % O 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This method is based on the expression of the transgene and not DNA amplification, as is the case for in situ hybridisation. It can therefore not be excluded that these vectors do have a slight defect in DNA amplification that cannot be detected by Southern blotting but that prevents the accumulation of sufficient amounts of vector DNA to be detected by in situ hybridisation [31]. The titres of these stocks are equivalent to those of first-generation vectors and 70% of them are free of RCV compared with 0% for first-generation stocks produced under the same conditions.…”
Section: Downstream Of the Transgene A) Defective Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%