2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/2500997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Method for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Roller Bearings Involving the Discrepancy and Similarity of Degradation Trajectories

Abstract: Accurate remaining useful life (RUL) prediction of bearings is the key to effective decision-making for predictive maintenance (PdM) of rotating machinery. However, the individual heterogeneity and different working conditions of bearings make the degradation trajectories of bearings different, resulting in the mismatch between the RUL prediction model established by the full-life training bearing and the testing bearings. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a novel RUL prediction method for roller … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual lifetimes of bearing1_1 and bearing1_2 are 28030s and 8710s, respectively. In this paper, the HI values corresponding to the end of life of the training set bearings are used as the fault thresholds for the same operating conditions [56]. The HI values corresponding to the end of life of the two training set bearings in figure 11 are 0.5.…”
Section: Health Indicator and Failure Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual lifetimes of bearing1_1 and bearing1_2 are 28030s and 8710s, respectively. In this paper, the HI values corresponding to the end of life of the training set bearings are used as the fault thresholds for the same operating conditions [56]. The HI values corresponding to the end of life of the two training set bearings in figure 11 are 0.5.…”
Section: Health Indicator and Failure Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the effectiveness of the suggested approach, a comparative analysis was conducted using methods from the following references to predict the RUL of the studied bearings. Specifically, the model-based method from [34] is referred to as M2, [35] is referred to as M3, [36] is referred to as M4, and [37] is referred to as M5. Additionally, the performance of the prediction methods was comprehensively evaluated using the scoring function from the IEEE PHM 2012 Challenge [38].…”
Section: Rul Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional machine learning algorithms commonly applied in intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery mainly contain support vector machines (SVM) [7,8] and artificial neural networks (ANN) [9,10]. However, the traditional intelligent diagnosis methods have inherent limitations [11]: (1) Variable working conditions and composite faults make it difficult to extract signal features effectively; (2) the extracted signal features must be selected with the advice of experienced engineering experts; (3) shallow machine learning algorithms are not able to adequately learn complex nonlinear relationships between the input data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%