2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for rapid comparative quantitative analysis of nuclear fuel cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both agronomists and statisticians reported many additional problems with it. Although commonly used for multidimensional data sets (Ge et al, 2009;Kozak 2010b;Kusano et al, 2011;Eastham et al, 2012;Winderbaum et al, 2012), it is relatively new. Its unusual coordinate system can be problematic for a new user (Wegman, 1990;Wegman and Carr, 1993;Kozak, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both agronomists and statisticians reported many additional problems with it. Although commonly used for multidimensional data sets (Ge et al, 2009;Kozak 2010b;Kusano et al, 2011;Eastham et al, 2012;Winderbaum et al, 2012), it is relatively new. Its unusual coordinate system can be problematic for a new user (Wegman, 1990;Wegman and Carr, 1993;Kozak, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A framework of performance metrics, which coupled with a first-order lumped reactor model to determine nuclide population balances, can be used to quantify the aforementioned cons and pros for a range of different reactor and nuclear fuel cycle combinations [21]. The framework includes metrics such as fuel reprocessing, fuel efficiency, spent fuel toxicity, and proliferation resistance.…”
Section: Nuclear Fuel Cycle Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debate as to which is the most appropriate technology continues, with each fuel system and reactor type delivering specific advantages and disadvantages which can be difficult to compare fairly. Eastham et al [1] came up with a novel method for rapid comparative quantitative analysis of nuclear fuel cycles. Its framework includes metrics such as fuel efficiency, spent fuel toxicity and proliferation resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%