2005
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for prokaryotic promoter prediction based on DNA stability

Abstract: Background: In the post-genomic era, correct gene prediction has become one of the biggest challenges in genome annotation. Improved promoter prediction methods can be one step towards developing more reliable ab initio gene prediction methods. This work presents a novel prokaryotic promoter prediction method based on DNA stability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
163
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 416 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the failure of Francisella promoters to function in E. coli is perplexing. As promoters can be recognized generally as areas of low GϩC content (37), and the consensus Ϫ10 and Ϫ35 promoter elements are made up of A or T nucleotides in 10 of 12 sites, it seems that an organism with a chromosome with a low GϩC content, such as Francisella, will have a genome highly enriched for promoter-like sequences and may need an extra identifying feature to reduce nonspecific transcription initiation. Alignment at the Ϫ10 box of the 17 Francisella promoters for which the transcription start sites have been identified revealed a "TGn" motif directly upstream of the Ϫ10 box in 8 of the 17 promoters (47%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the failure of Francisella promoters to function in E. coli is perplexing. As promoters can be recognized generally as areas of low GϩC content (37), and the consensus Ϫ10 and Ϫ35 promoter elements are made up of A or T nucleotides in 10 of 12 sites, it seems that an organism with a chromosome with a low GϩC content, such as Francisella, will have a genome highly enriched for promoter-like sequences and may need an extra identifying feature to reduce nonspecific transcription initiation. Alignment at the Ϫ10 box of the 17 Francisella promoters for which the transcription start sites have been identified revealed a "TGn" motif directly upstream of the Ϫ10 box in 8 of the 17 promoters (47%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the time-course data of a system are available, using dynamic system modeling is more appropriate than using statistical approach because it can model the dynamic behavior of the system (Tegner et al 2003; Chen et al 2004; Chen et al 2005; Chang et al 2005; Chang et al 2006). Therefore, in this paper we use a dynamic system model of gene regulation to describe the mechanism of how TFs may control a gene’s expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of DNA geometric descriptors. differences in the stability of DNA, provide much better criteria than sequences alone for distinguishing promoter regions from non-promoter regions [1,8,9,13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the sequence-dependent flexibility of the DNA three-dimensional (3D) structure is important for transcriptional regulation in the single binding sites and core promoter regions. Regulatory sequences such as core promoter regions not only contain specific sequence elements that serve as targets for interacting proteins, but also usually exhibit distinct structural properties [7][8][9][10][11]. The comprehensive analysis of promoter regions in all the investigated prokaryotic genomes shows that promoter DNA is more easy curved, less flexible, and less stable than DNA in coding regions and in intergenic DNA without promoters [8,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%