2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.10.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for pesticide analysis in refined sugar samples using a gas chromatography–mass spectrometer (GC–MS/MS) and simple solvent extraction method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 27 refined sugar samples were analysed in which one sample showed a detectable level of the chlorpyrifos. This study showed that Indian sugar is free from the commonly-used pesticides at the low µgg -1 levels (Sinha et al, 2011 Table 1. Different reported methods in food matrices.…”
Section: Chromatography Equipped With Different Detector For Analysismentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In this study, 27 refined sugar samples were analysed in which one sample showed a detectable level of the chlorpyrifos. This study showed that Indian sugar is free from the commonly-used pesticides at the low µgg -1 levels (Sinha et al, 2011 Table 1. Different reported methods in food matrices.…”
Section: Chromatography Equipped With Different Detector For Analysismentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The extracted ion chromatograms of alachlor, malathion, dimethoate, chlorpyrifos and metribuzin (10 µg · L -1 spikes) are shown in Figure 2. The isolation of ions of OP pesticides was carried out in a similar fashion as per the reported method [10,14,17,18]. In first series of experiment the full scan spectra were recorded, using manual tuning in FIA mode after that the characteristic stable ions were isolated for MRM transition for confirmation and quantification of five pesticides in water samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inter-day percentage recoveries, the relative standard deviation (RSD), limit of quantification (LOQ) and the limit of detection (LOD) were determined as per the reported methodology [17,18], and the results are shown in Table 4. The obtained percent recoveries for all these pesticides were found to be in the range of 96% -103% of the standard value (Table 2) [19,20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the use of pesticides in agricultural applications provides a wide range of beneficial effects, their inappropriate use can result in unacceptably high levels of compounds in the products that could reach the consumers directly or indirectly (Cserháti et al, 2004;Walorczyk, 2007). The extensive use of pesticides has been a concern because of their potential harm to the environment and known or suspected toxic effects in humans, such as acute neurological toxicity, neurodevelopmental impairment, possible dysfunction of the immune, reproductive and endocrine systems, cancer, chronic kidney diseases and other potential diseases (Guan et al, 2010;Hercegová, Dömötörová, & Matisová, 2007;Sinha et al, 2011). Due to these concerns, the monitoring of pesticide residues in food products, especially in raw fruits and vegetables, must be pursued.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%