2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for cross-species gene expression analysis

Abstract: BackgroundAnalysis of gene expression from different species is a powerful way to identify evolutionarily conserved transcriptional responses. However, due to evolutionary events such as gene duplication, there is no one-to-one correspondence between genes from different species which makes comparison of their expression profiles complex.ResultsIn this paper we describe a new method for cross-species meta-analysis of gene expression. The method takes the homology structure between compared species into account… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EOGs were obtained from OrthoDB (21) (accessed October 15, 2013). To use a broad criterion for homology, we retained all paralogs (74), ultimately selecting the paralog showing the highest degree of differential expression between experimental and control conditions as the species representative for each homologous triplet. Homologous triplet combined significance scores were calculated using Fisher's method [R package MADAM (75)].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EOGs were obtained from OrthoDB (21) (accessed October 15, 2013). To use a broad criterion for homology, we retained all paralogs (74), ultimately selecting the paralog showing the highest degree of differential expression between experimental and control conditions as the species representative for each homologous triplet. Homologous triplet combined significance scores were calculated using Fisher's method [R package MADAM (75)].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending such approaches to infer genome-scale networks for a large phylogeny with complex orthologies can be computationally expensive. While a number of studies have compared gene expression profiles across multiple species (Bergmann et al, 2003; Ihmels et al, 2005; Kristiansson et al, 2013; Roy et al, 2013b), these approaches typically identify gene modules that are conserved or diverged across species and do not provide fine-grained regulatory network connectivity information. Such information is critical to identify specific regulatory connections evolution must have made and broken as the species diverged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analysed genegroups for GO category enrichment, KEGG enrichment and transcription factors (as above). We then determined differentially expressed gene-groups across Andropogon and Sorghastrum with respect to treatment using the meta-level analytic method described inKristiansson et al (2013). This technique is powerful for deducing species by environment interactions where multiple orthologs and paralogs are found within each gene-group, as would be expected comparing species of different ploidies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%