2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method based on coyote algorithm for simultaneous network reconfiguration and distribution generation placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Case 5: Feeder performance improvement via simultaneous optimal allocation of DGs and EV fleet considering loss minimization and voltage stability maximization: In this case, the increased loading condition across the network is taken as total power rating of a single EV fleet and optimized its location along with DG locations and sizes. FSA resulted lowest objective function by EV fleet location at 2 and DGs sizes in kW and locations are: 1179(7), 1317 (17), 427 (30), correspondingly the losses (3.6418 kW + j 2.6495 kVAr), lowest voltage at 11th bus is 0.9981 and VSI is 0.9923.…”
Section: Practical 36-bus Residential Feedermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Case 5: Feeder performance improvement via simultaneous optimal allocation of DGs and EV fleet considering loss minimization and voltage stability maximization: In this case, the increased loading condition across the network is taken as total power rating of a single EV fleet and optimized its location along with DG locations and sizes. FSA resulted lowest objective function by EV fleet location at 2 and DGs sizes in kW and locations are: 1179(7), 1317 (17), 427 (30), correspondingly the losses (3.6418 kW + j 2.6495 kVAr), lowest voltage at 11th bus is 0.9981 and VSI is 0.9923.…”
Section: Practical 36-bus Residential Feedermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study revealed that the DGs with non-unity power factor can improve RDNs performance significantly than the DGs with unity power factor. Coyote optimization algorithm (COA) [30] is proposed for optimal integration of DGs in RDNs considering multi-objective function, formed using real power loss, operating cost and voltage stability. In [31], an improved variant of COA as enhanced coyote optimization algorithm (ECOA) is proposed for solving simultaneous optimal network reconfiguration and DG allocation problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm has recently been applied in several applications, especially to feature selection [54], tune heavy-duty gas turbine hyperparameters [55], optimal power flow for transmission power networks [56] define networks reconfiguration [57], and for optimal parameter estimation of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell [58]. Due to the promising potentials results, a search of the literature reveals that the COA has not yet been applied for the CEEMD's hyperparameters definition, then it is adopted.…”
Section: Coyote Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DSR and CBs placement were concurrently presented in literature based on fuzzy binary gravitational search algorithm [30]; ant colony algorithm [31]. Also, DSR functionality and DGs allocation were concurrently presented using various methods, for example, dataset approach with marine predators algorithm [32]; coyote algorithm [33]; hybrid genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization and blue whale optimization [34]. In addition, optimal placement of CBs and DGs have been solved using particle swarm optimization [3], water cycle algorithm [35], enhanced grey wolf algorithm [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%