2012
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel maternally‐derived insertional translocation resulting in partial trisomy 4q13.2–q22.1 with complex translocation t(8;20) in a family with intellectual disability

Abstract: We characterized the chromosomal aberration in family with intellectual disability, including two affected children and their affected mother. Initial standard karyotypes of the three individuals showed an apparently balanced translocation of chromosomes 8 and 20. Using molecular cytogenetic techniques, we observed complex structural chromosomal aberration comprising of reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 8 and 20 with pericentric inversion (8p11.12q22.3) and insertion of chromosome 4 segments into bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Common segmental aneusomies result from deletion, duplication, triplication, terminal translocation, and insertional translocation [Kang et al, ; Assawamakin et al, ; Thierry et al, ]. Our patient showed segmental trisomy of 11q23.3‐q25 with no copy number changes in another chromosome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Common segmental aneusomies result from deletion, duplication, triplication, terminal translocation, and insertional translocation [Kang et al, ; Assawamakin et al, ; Thierry et al, ]. Our patient showed segmental trisomy of 11q23.3‐q25 with no copy number changes in another chromosome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the proximal 4q chromosomal aberrations identified in patients with neurodevelopmental phenotypes are rare, non recurrent, heterogeneous in size (usually affecting several megabases of sequence) and breakpoints and, in consequence, involve different chromosome bands and a high number of genes [Zollino et al, ; Nowaczyk et al, ; Shashi et al, ; Eggermann et al, ; Bonnet et al, ; Lipska et al, ; Assawamakin et al, ; Girirajan et al, ; Matoso et al, ; Shimada et al, ; Hemati et al, 2014; Utine et al, ]. Amongst these alterations we can distinguish chromosomal aberrations restricted to 4q13 chromosome bands [Girirajan et al, ; Matoso et al, ; Shimada et al, ] (Table ), as those of our patients, from larger alterations involving additional chromosome bands [Zollino et al, ; Nowaczyk et al, ; Shashi et al, ; Eggermann et al, ; Bonnet et al, ; Lipska et al, ; Assawamakin et al, ; Hemati et al, 2014; Utine et al, ]. Figure is an schematic overview of the proximal 4q region showing the SNP array results in our patients, previously reported chromosomal alterations restricted to 4q13 chromosome bands and OMIM‐morbidity and candidate genes implicated in this interval (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that sense, Assawamakin et al [] have recently described a family with ID and a maternally derived complex structural variation resulting in partial trisomy 4q13.2‐q22.1 with a complex translocation t(8;20) in two affected siblings with ID. Their mother, also with cognitive impairment, carried the same complex chromosomal aberration present in her children but in combination with a heterozygous 4q13.2‐q22.1 deletion, resulting in no copy number change in this region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the more than 90 genes that may be deleted in 22q13.3 deletion syndrome (Phelan-McDermid syndrome), the majority of the neurological features are thought to be caused by haploinsufficiency of SHANK3 [22] which is deleted in patient 3 too. 4q duplication is a rare condition that usually presents with MR and multiple abnormalities, including microcephaly, malformed ears, flat nasal bridge, tooth and thumb anomalies [23,24], most of which are shared by patient 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%