2015 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icuas.2015.7152338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel magnetometer-accelerometer calibration based on a least squares approach

Abstract: In this work a calibration method which is easy to use and is capable of calibrating a combination of a magnetometer and an accelerometer is described. The calibration method accounts for hard and soft iron effects created by the platform, sensor errors like biases, scale factors and non-orthogonalities as well as the relative orientation between the magnetometer and the accelerometer. The algorithm is based on a least squares problem, which is solved using a singular value decomposition. During the calibratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All norms in this work are Euclidean norms unless it is stated otherwise. In (6), without loss of generality, we assume the magnitude of the gravity and of the magnetic field are both one. Note that in (5), both T a and f k for the accelerometer and T m and m k for the magnetometer are unknowns and therefore (5) is a quartic cost function as it involves the square of their product.…”
Section: Joint Accelerometer and Magnetometer Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All norms in this work are Euclidean norms unless it is stated otherwise. In (6), without loss of generality, we assume the magnitude of the gravity and of the magnetic field are both one. Note that in (5), both T a and f k for the accelerometer and T m and m k for the magnetometer are unknowns and therefore (5) is a quartic cost function as it involves the square of their product.…”
Section: Joint Accelerometer and Magnetometer Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, many authors exploit the fact that the measured specific force's magnitude should be constant and independent of the sensor's orientation while it is still. Using this fact, they formulate the sensor's calibration, either as an optimization problem [5][6][7][8] or as an estimation one [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the thermographic camera can be deployed in almost any type of terrain or location, nearby metallic structures or buildings can contribute to this effect and distort the sensed magnetic field, which ideally should only be due to the Earth’s own magnetic field. An effective procedure [ 20 , 21 ] for the magnetometer is imperative to overcome these magnetic interferences and must be carried out periodically to ensure the health of the sensor.…”
Section: Sources Of Error and Limitations Of An Automated Wildfirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, it is a nonlinear optimisation problem. At present, optimised algorithms, such as the magnetic deviation algorithm (Basterretxeairibar et al, 2016), least squares algorithm (Alonso and Shuster, 2002; Ammann et al, 2015) and particle swarm algorithm (Ali et al, 2012) have been applied and some progress has been made. However, there are still some shortcomings (Cai et al, 2016; Ge et al, 2017): (1) The random magnetic interference field is usually difficult to model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%