2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel lift-off diameter model for boiling bubbles in natural gas liquids transmission pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saffman (1965) [ 16 ], derived an expression for the lift force acting on spherical bubbles at laminar regime under the presence of a velocity gradient, and a modified equation was presented by Mei and Klausner (1994) [ 17 ] where is the lift coefficient, is the relative velocity between the fluid and the droplet and a is the bubble or droplet’s radius. In regard to the relative velocity , no model for the bubble sliding velocity exists in the literature, [ 12 ], but in view of the several uncertainties in the analysis we assume a bubble sliding velocity half of the local fluid, i.e., as suggested by [ 12 ] and [ 13 ], which seems that is the best figure which agrees well with the predictions by those authors in the calculation of the lift. For small Reynolds numbers, the lift coefficient is simplified as [ 12 ]: where is the radial velocity gradient which can already be calculated from Eq.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Saffman (1965) [ 16 ], derived an expression for the lift force acting on spherical bubbles at laminar regime under the presence of a velocity gradient, and a modified equation was presented by Mei and Klausner (1994) [ 17 ] where is the lift coefficient, is the relative velocity between the fluid and the droplet and a is the bubble or droplet’s radius. In regard to the relative velocity , no model for the bubble sliding velocity exists in the literature, [ 12 ], but in view of the several uncertainties in the analysis we assume a bubble sliding velocity half of the local fluid, i.e., as suggested by [ 12 ] and [ 13 ], which seems that is the best figure which agrees well with the predictions by those authors in the calculation of the lift. For small Reynolds numbers, the lift coefficient is simplified as [ 12 ]: where is the radial velocity gradient which can already be calculated from Eq.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The simplifying assumptions valid for a first analytical assessment of the problem are as follows: The channels between fibres are represented by its hydraulic diameter, i.e, by an equivalent circular channel Laminar flow. The typical values for Reynolds number for medical mask are below 50, and thus the assumption is more than justified Airborne particles are spherical For preliminary calculations, it is taken the relative velocity between the particle and the flow half of the local fluid velocity as suggested by [ 12 , 13 ] To begin with, let us consider a traditional face mask. It is basically formed by a stack of -vertical layers -generally 3 of them for the case of N95s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To analyze the commissioning process in undulating terrain, we firstly classify the pipeline in terms of the inclination angle, backpressure, and elevation differences, which also allows exploring the terrain in terms of the inclination angle and elevation difference [38]. In an actual pipeline, the inclination angle usually refers to the angle between the centerline of the pipeline and the horizontal direction (ranging from −90 • to 90 • ), which is positive in the counterclockwise direction and is often replaced by a slope in practical engineering [39]. The slope is calculated by dividing the height difference of a certain section by the mileage difference, which is the tangent of the pipe angle.…”
Section: Division Of Different Pipeline Terrainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous progress of computer technology leads to the rapid development of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology [4,13]. Relying on theoretical modeling basis, CFD methods can not only help to understand fluid dynamics problems intuitively and clearly, providing references for experiments and research design, but also greatly save labor, material and time [6,14,15]. Therefore, CFD methods are gradually becoming an important tool for studying flow problems together with experimental fluid dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%