2021
DOI: 10.3390/tomography7030026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Iterative MLEM Image Reconstruction Algorithm Based on Beltrami Filter: Application to ECT Images

Abstract: The implementation of emission-computed tomography (ECT), including positron emission tomography and single-photon emission-computed tomography, has been an important research topic in recent years and is of significant and practical importance. However, the slow rate of convergence and the computational complexity have severely impeded the efficient implementation of iterative reconstruction. By combining the maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) iteratively along with the Beltrami filter, this p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional reconstruction algorithms include filtered back projection (FBP) and the iterative reconstruction algorithm. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Although the FBP algorithm is fast, it is based on an ideal reconstruction process that ignores the noise in the original data, resulting in dynamically reconstructed images that contain a large number of radiometric artifacts. [11,12] In contrast, the iterative algorithm uses a system model and regularization, which makes the quality of reconstructed images better than the FBP algorithm, but the computational complexity of each iteration process in the iterative algorithm is equivalent to one FBP algorithm, so the reconstruction speed of the iterative algorithm is usually much slower than that of the FBP algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional reconstruction algorithms include filtered back projection (FBP) and the iterative reconstruction algorithm. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Although the FBP algorithm is fast, it is based on an ideal reconstruction process that ignores the noise in the original data, resulting in dynamically reconstructed images that contain a large number of radiometric artifacts. [11,12] In contrast, the iterative algorithm uses a system model and regularization, which makes the quality of reconstructed images better than the FBP algorithm, but the computational complexity of each iteration process in the iterative algorithm is equivalent to one FBP algorithm, so the reconstruction speed of the iterative algorithm is usually much slower than that of the FBP algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT reconstruction methods can be broadly classified into three categories, i.e., sinogramdomain reconstruction, iterative reconstruction (IR) and image-domain reconstruction. Sinogram-domain methods perform denoising, the removal of artifacts and interpolation in sinogram data by utilizing traditional filtering algorithms [3][4][5], dictionary-based approaches [6] and deep learning-based methods [7]. Filtering algorithms have the advantages of their computation cost and reconstruction speed but fail to achieve satisfying performance when the raw data are severely lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%