2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-018-0264-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel interaction fingerprint derived from per atom score contributions: exhaustive evaluation of interaction fingerprint performance in docking based virtual screening

Abstract: Protein ligand interaction fingerprints are a powerful approach for the analysis and assessment of docking poses to improve docking performance in virtual screening. In this study, a novel interaction fingerprint approach (PADIF, protein per atom score contributions derived interaction fingerprint) is presented which was specifically designed for utilising the GOLD scoring functions’ atom contributions together with a specific scoring scheme. This allows the incorporation of known protein–ligand complex struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents an advantage over other parameters used to compare the binding modes of LR complexes such as the root‐mean‐square deviation (RMSD), whose limitations have been discussed elsewhere . The approach also differs from binary interaction fingerprints‐based similarity indices, commonly used for docking‐based virtual screening and scoring . The parameter allows for comparison of two complexes considering different receptor structures or conformations in each complex.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This represents an advantage over other parameters used to compare the binding modes of LR complexes such as the root‐mean‐square deviation (RMSD), whose limitations have been discussed elsewhere . The approach also differs from binary interaction fingerprints‐based similarity indices, commonly used for docking‐based virtual screening and scoring . The parameter allows for comparison of two complexes considering different receptor structures or conformations in each complex.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As mentioned in the Introduction, this study was based on the DUD datasets since a huge number of even very recent benchmarking studies utilizes them to assess the reliability of various VS techniques; these studies allow the here proposed consensus strategy to be extensively compared with other highly performing VS approaches. Firstly, attention was focused on a set of very recent papers which apply innovative VS methodologies, such as interaction fingerprints [27], machine learning based scoring [26] and ligand-based screening under shape constraints [25]. Along with the novelty of the implemented approach, these studies were chosen because they comprised all available DUD datasets thus allowing a precise comparison with the here reported results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the binding interaction pattern through the protein‐ligand interaction fingerprint (PLIF) was analysed . The optimized protein structures were aligned to generate PLIF model in MOE 2019.01 PLIF module .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%