2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.105044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel in vivo predictive dissolution testing coupled with a modeling and simulation for hydrogel matrix monolithic extended release oral dosage forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an alternative method, the in vitro determination of the particle size of the dissolved SDs that correlates with in vivo absorption may be useful because the presence of large amorphous particles in dissolved SDs in an aqueous solution has been reported. 25) Furthermore, methods for the investigation of hydrogel formulations and amorphous solid dispersions-in which in vitro biorelevant dissolution testing is coupled with in silico modeling and simulation to predict oral absorption-may be relevant to the current gummi with SD formulations. 26,27) The findings of the current study suggest that PVA 66, PVA 66/88, and PVA 80 are suitable in terms of dissolution, stabil- Each geometric mean ratio between two phases is given with the corresponding 90% confidence interval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative method, the in vitro determination of the particle size of the dissolved SDs that correlates with in vivo absorption may be useful because the presence of large amorphous particles in dissolved SDs in an aqueous solution has been reported. 25) Furthermore, methods for the investigation of hydrogel formulations and amorphous solid dispersions-in which in vitro biorelevant dissolution testing is coupled with in silico modeling and simulation to predict oral absorption-may be relevant to the current gummi with SD formulations. 26,27) The findings of the current study suggest that PVA 66, PVA 66/88, and PVA 80 are suitable in terms of dissolution, stabil- Each geometric mean ratio between two phases is given with the corresponding 90% confidence interval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The good in vitro dissolution apparatus along with modeling has been a good predictive method of the bioperformance for BCS class II drugs to assess its oral absorption because of their high permeability characteristics. 30,46,47 BCS class IIa drugs (pKa~4e5) like ibuprofen of immediate release (IR) dosage forms dissolve well at the pH environment in the small intestine and behave like BCS class I drugs due to the much faster dissolution entering the small intestine. With that reason, BCS class IIa drugs often become biowaiver candidates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SR tablets with faster dissolution would be more sensitive to in vitro conditions; accordingly, an original in vitro method with very limited volume of fluid� relevant to the small intestinal lumen�was appropriate for the SR tablet used. 37 Many examples of in vivo performance prediction for lipophilic matrix SR tablets reported to date have used an in vitro USP Apparatus III coupled with an in silico modeling and simulation, 31,34,38 although the C max of a lipophilic matrix SR tablet of diclofenac was significantly overestimated using the approach. 34 This might be because the drugs used in this DDS formulation in these previous studies had pH-dependent solubility, possibly for the same reason as in the hydrophilic matrix SR tablets.…”
Section: Controlled Release Formulations 221 Sustained Release Formul...mentioning
confidence: 99%