2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel improved particle swarm optimization algorithm based on individual difference evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally speaking, BPSO is a useful optimization tool and it has been successfully applied for many feature selection tasks. However, BPSO suffers from the premature convergence and slow convergence rate [15][16][17]. Additionally, one of the major drawbacks of BPSO is the setting of the inertia weight [18].…”
Section: Co-evolution Binary Particle Swarm Optimization With Multiplmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, BPSO is a useful optimization tool and it has been successfully applied for many feature selection tasks. However, BPSO suffers from the premature convergence and slow convergence rate [15][16][17]. Additionally, one of the major drawbacks of BPSO is the setting of the inertia weight [18].…”
Section: Co-evolution Binary Particle Swarm Optimization With Multiplmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each problem, the best solution is a bird in the search space, namely a "particle", and the optimal solution is the "corn field" that the birds are looking for [29]. Each particle has a position vector and a velocity vector, and the adaptive value of the current position can be calculated according to the objective function, which can be understood as the distance from the "corn field".…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimization Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some hardware options to decrease execution time include FPGA [49,50], GPU [51], faster processors [52] or computer clusters [53,54]. Algorithm optimization examples are found in studies by Gou et al [55], Naderi et al [56] and Sánchez-Oro et al [57].…”
Section: Computer Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%