2023
DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.05135-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel immunotherapy prognostic score for patients with pretreated advanced urInary TrAct CArcinoma from the subgroup analysis of the SAUL study: the ITACA Score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the treatment of mUC, Fornarini et al analyzed a real-world cohort of more than 250 patients treated in Italy with atezolizumab in the phase IIIb SAUL trial and found a significant association between survival outcomes (PFS and OS), NLR (cut-off: 3, 3.65, and 5), and SII (cut-off: 884 and 1375) [ 12 ]. On analyzing all patients enrolled in the trial, they confirmed a prognostic role for NLR (HR for OS: 1.66 and 2.17 for NLR cut-off 3 and 5, respectively) and SII (HR for OS: 2.16 and 2.19 for SII cut-off 884 and 1375, respectively); consequently, they were able to create a novel prognostic score for OS [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Regarding the treatment of mUC, Fornarini et al analyzed a real-world cohort of more than 250 patients treated in Italy with atezolizumab in the phase IIIb SAUL trial and found a significant association between survival outcomes (PFS and OS), NLR (cut-off: 3, 3.65, and 5), and SII (cut-off: 884 and 1375) [ 12 ]. On analyzing all patients enrolled in the trial, they confirmed a prognostic role for NLR (HR for OS: 1.66 and 2.17 for NLR cut-off 3 and 5, respectively) and SII (HR for OS: 2.16 and 2.19 for SII cut-off 884 and 1375, respectively); consequently, they were able to create a novel prognostic score for OS [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%