1998
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel k‐space trajectory measurement technique

Abstract: A new k-space trajectory measurement technique is proposed and demonstrated. This technique measures the k-space trajectory, in seconds, using only a few readout lines, using phase values of acquired MR signals. As a result of the technique's efficiency, k-space trajectory measurement using patient data becomes possible. The utility of this techniques is demonstrated in phantom and human studies at 4.1 T.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. Briefly, signals are acquired from two slices located along the axis of the gradient of interest (e.g., x-axis), at positions x 1 and x 2 (x 1 x 2 ).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6. Briefly, signals are acquired from two slices located along the axis of the gradient of interest (e.g., x-axis), at positions x 1 and x 2 (x 1 x 2 ).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] represents a Fourier transform relation between signal S i and the "effective magnetization density" i (x)e -j (t) . In practice, the phase term (t) can be neglected in the following calculations (6). For a sample that is homogeneous over the slice, the effective magnetization density is equivalent to the slice profile.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Beaumont et al (9) recognized that for the methods of Zhang et al (7) and Duyn et al (8), low or zero amplitude values would occur at k-space locations farther from the origin than a distance equal to the inverse of the slice thickness. The slice thickness must therefore be kept very small to obtain accurate estimates of larger k-space values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%